1971•British journal of surgeryRequires access

Elective lymph-node dissection for melanoma

Neville C. Davis, G. Roderick McLeod

Open publisher page 20 citations

Abstract

Abstract The value of elective lymph-node dissection in the treatment of malignant melanoma is controversial. It can be beneficial only if the apparently normal lymph-nodes contain metastases. Unfortunately, there is no way of telling before operation whether they do or not. However, a knowledge of the factors which suggest, on statistical grounds, a good or bad prognosis can help to forecast whether the lymphnodes are likely to contain metastases. If there are factors suggesting a good prognosis the regional nodes are not likely to contain occult metastases. In these circumstances elective dissection should be avoided and reliance placed on regular clinical evaluation of the nodes with subsequent therapeutic dissection if indicated. If there are factors suggesting a bad prognosis the regional nodes may contain occult metastases and prophylactic dissection should be seriously considered. However, if follow-up facilities are good the alternative method of obseration is acceptable and the choice of treatment will rest with the surgeon and the patient. The site of the tumour is also important. If a deeply invasive melanoma overlies or is immediately adjacent to the regional nodes, elective dissection is indicated. On the other hand, if the melanoma is in an area with unpredictable lymph drainage or if it is at a distance from the nodes, observation is the best policy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract The value of elective lymph-node dissection in the treatment of malignant melanoma is controversial. It can be beneficial only if the apparently normal lymph-nodes contain metastases. Unfortunately, there is no way of telling before operation whether they do or not. However, a knowledge of the factors which suggest, on statistical grounds, a good or bad prognosis can help to forecast whether the lymphnodes are likely to contain metastases. If there are factors suggesting a good prognosis the regional nodes are not likely to contain occult metastases. In these circumstances elective dissection should be avoided and reliance placed on regular clinical evaluation of the nodes with subsequent therapeutic dissection if indicated. If there are factors suggesting a bad prognosis the regional nodes may contain occult metastases and prophylactic dissection should be seriously considered. However, if follow-up facilities are good the alternative method of obseration is acceptable and the choice of treatment will rest with the surgeon and the patient. The site of the tumour is also important. If a deeply invasive melanoma overlies or is immediately adjacent to the regional nodes, elective dissection is indicated. On the other hand, if the melanoma is in an area with unpredictable lymph drainage or if it is at a distance from the nodes, observation is the best policy.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract The value of elective lymph-node dissection in the treatment of malignant melanoma is controversial. It can be beneficial only if the apparently normal lymph-nodes contain metastases. Unfortunately, there is no way of telling before operation whether they do or not. However, a knowledge of the factors which suggest, on statistical grounds, a good or bad prognosis can help to forecast whether the lymphnodes are likely to contain metastases. If there are factors suggesting a good prognosis the regional nodes are not likely to contain occult metastases. In these circumstances elective dissection should be avoided and reliance placed on regular clinical evaluation of the nodes with subsequent therapeutic dissection if indicated. If there are factors suggesting a bad prognosis the regional nodes may contain occult metastases and prophylactic dissection should be seriously considered. However, if follow-up facilities are good the alternative method of obseration is acceptable and the choice of treatment will rest with the surgeon and the patient. The site of the tumour is also important. If a deeply invasive melanoma overlies or is immediately adjacent to the regional nodes, elective dissection is indicated. On the other hand, if the melanoma is in an area with unpredictable lymph drainage or if it is at a distance from the nodes, observation is the best policy.

Key concepts: Medicine, Occult, Dissection (medical), Melanoma, Lymph node, Lymph, Surgery, General surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Elective lymph-node dissection for melanoma — Research Paper | ScholarLens