Foster and Kinship Care: An Examination of the Legislation that Aims to Improve Permanency and Continuity of Care in Ontario
Kimberly Brisebois, Lee Shawna
Abstract
Kimberly Brisebois, Lee Shawna
Abstract
Changes to the Ontario child welfare system in 2006 were based on the premise that expanding kinship placement options for children in the care of the Society would improve permanency outcomes and minimize placement disruptions. This study examined whether foster care or kinship care were associated with permanency outcomes and continuity of care of children. Analyses indicated that children living in foster care were more likely to achieve permanency, but were more likely to be separated from siblings. Children in kinship care were more likely to engage in running (AWOL) behaviour. There were no differences in placement disruptions, with both kinship and foster care placements exhibiting strength and dedication to youth stability. These findings suggest that Ontario legislation promoting kinship care may not contribute to improved permanency for children as originally anticipated.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Changes to the Ontario child welfare system in 2006 were based on the premise that expanding kinship placement options for children in the care of the Society would improve permanency outcomes and minimize placement disruptions. This study examined whether foster care or kinship care were associated with permanency outcomes and continuity of care of children. Analyses indicated that children living in foster care were more likely to achieve permanency, but were more likely to be separated from siblings. Children in kinship care were more likely to engage in running (AWOL) behaviour. There were no differences in placement disruptions, with both kinship and foster care placements exhibiting strength and dedication to youth stability. These findings suggest that Ontario legislation promoting kinship care may not contribute to improved permanency for children as originally anticipated.
Key concepts: Kinship care, Kinship, Foster care, Legislation, Premise, Paternal care, Welfare, Welfare system