1994Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal ProductionRequires access

Comparative performance of Angus cattle and swamp buffalo fed ad libitum either a lucerne hay and concentrate ration or pasture hay

Thomson Na, Death Af, Power Mt

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Voluntary intake and liveweight gain of Angus cattle (CAP) and swamp buffalo (B) were compared on 2 feeds; ad lib. luceme hay (L) + 1 kg concentrate/animal/day (LC) and nd lib. pasture hay (P) in a 2 x 2 Latin square designed trial. The two hays had similar ME values; L, 8.5 and P 8.7 MJ/MJYkg DM, but differed (P ~0.05) in protein content; L, 14.6% and P IO. 1%. The concentrate was 13.5 MJ ME/kg DM and 14.1% protein. Animals were fed in a feed-lot with individual pens/treatment. Intake was assessed on a group basis for all treatments and individual animal intake was assessed for the P treatments only using slow release chromium capsules. Two, 4 week. experimental periods were preceded by a 2 week feed adjustment period. Liveweight gains showed a species x fed interaction (P ~0.001) with individual treatment gains (kg/day) of; 0.80, -0.54, -0.02, -0.09 for CLC, CP, BLC, and BP groups respectively. Cattle consumed (group assessment) more (P ~0.05) L hay than buffalo; 127 vs 99 g DW kg LWT’.75. The intake of P hay was similar for each species; 102 and 100 g DM/kg LWF’.7s for C and B respectively. The release of Cr,O, from the capsules were similar for the two species (1.56 g/day). Intakes of P hay assessed by the marker technique differed (P <O.OS); 100 and 88 g DiWkg LWl?.7s for the CP and BP treatments respectively. The difference in performance of the two species on P may have been the result of the marginal (for cattle) protein levels. No explanation is given for the poor performance of buffalo on the LC ration.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Voluntary intake and liveweight gain of Angus cattle (CAP) and swamp buffalo (B) were compared on 2 feeds; ad lib. luceme hay (L) + 1 kg concentrate/animal/day (LC) and nd lib. pasture hay (P) in a 2 x 2 Latin square designed trial. The two hays had similar ME values; L, 8.5 and P 8.7 MJ/MJYkg DM, but differed (P ~0.05) in protein content; L, 14.6% and P IO. 1%. The concentrate was 13.5 MJ ME/kg DM and 14.1% protein. Animals were fed in a feed-lot with individual pens/treatment. Intake was assessed on a group basis for all treatments and individual animal intake was assessed for the P treatments only using slow release chromium capsules. Two, 4 week. experimental periods were preceded by a 2 week feed adjustment period. Liveweight gains showed a species x fed interaction (P ~0.001) with individual treatment gains (kg/day) of; 0.80, -0.54, -0.02, -0.09 for CLC, CP, BLC, and BP groups respectively. Cattle consumed (group assessment) more (P ~0.05) L hay than buffalo; 127 vs 99 g DW kg LWT’.75. The intake of P hay was similar for each species; 102 and 100 g DM/kg LWF’.7s for C and B respectively. The release of Cr,O, from the capsules were similar for the two species (1.56 g/day). Intakes of P hay assessed by the marker technique differed (P <O.OS); 100 and 88 g DiWkg LWl?.7s for the CP and BP treatments respectively. The difference in performance of the two species on P may have been the result of the marginal (for cattle) protein levels. No explanation is given for the poor performance of buffalo on the LC ration.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Voluntary intake and liveweight gain of Angus cattle (CAP) and swamp buffalo (B) were compared on 2 feeds; ad lib. luceme hay (L) + 1 kg concentrate/animal/day (LC) and nd lib. pasture hay (P) in a 2 x 2 Latin square designed trial. The two hays had similar ME values; L, 8.5 and P 8.7 MJ/MJYkg DM, but differed (P ~0.05) in protein content; L, 14.6% and P IO. 1%. The concentrate was 13.5 MJ ME/kg DM and 14.1% protein. Animals were fed in a feed-lot with individual pens/treatment. Intake was assessed on a group basis for all treatments and individual animal intake was assessed for the P treatments only using slow release chromium capsules. Two, 4 week. experimental periods were preceded by a 2 week feed adjustment period. Liveweight gains showed a species x fed interaction (P ~0.001) with individual treatment gains (kg/day) of; 0.80, -0.54, -0.02, -0.09 for CLC, CP, BLC, and BP groups respectively. Cattle consumed (group assessment) more (P ~0.05) L hay than buffalo; 127 vs 99 g DW kg LWT’.75. The intake of P hay was similar for each species; 102 and 100 g DM/kg LWF’.7s for C and B respectively. The release of Cr,O, from the capsules were similar for the two species (1.56 g/day). Intakes of P hay assessed by the marker technique differed (P <O.OS); 100 and 88 g DiWkg LWl?.7s for the CP and BP treatments respectively. The difference in performance of the two species on P may have been the result of the marginal (for cattle) protein levels. No explanation is given for the poor performance of buffalo on the LC ration.

Key concepts: Hay, Pasture, Animal science, Latin square, Biology, Rumen, Agronomy, Food science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative performance of Angus cattle and swamp buffalo fed ad libitum either a lucerne hay and concentrate ration or pasture hay — Research Paper | ScholarLens