1996Annals of BotanyOpen access

The Effect of Supplementary Pollination on Nut Set ofMacadamia(Proteaceae)

Helen M. Wallace

Open full text 74 citations

Abstract

The effects of supplementary pollination on initial and final nut set and nut weight of the Macadamia cultivars, ' Hawaii Agricultural Experiment Station 246 ' and ' Hidden Valley A4 ', were assessed over 3 years at an orchard in eastern Australia.The final nut sets of racemes bagged to exclude insect pollinators were low in all 3 years of the study for both cultivars.This demonstrated the importance of exposure to insect visitors to increase nut set of these cultivars.However, the improved initial nut set by supplementary cross pollination of 246 in all 3 years of the study showed that insect pollination is inefficient compared to hand pollination.Furthermore, supplementary cross pollination of 246 increased final nut set by 57-97 % in 1989 and increased nut weight by 15n0 % and kernel weight by 20n0 % in 1991.Cross pollination of A4 did not result in any consistent pattern of initial nut set and did not improve final nut set, but increased nut weight by 11n6 % and kernel weight by 18n4 %, with a higher percentage kernel recovery in 1991.In addition, supplementary self pollination of A4 increased nut sets in both 1989 and 1990.Yield and quality of both cultivars may benefit from increasing pollen transfer in the orchard.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The effects of supplementary pollination on initial and final nut set and nut weight of the Macadamia cultivars, ' Hawaii Agricultural Experiment Station 246 ' and ' Hidden Valley A4 ', were assessed over 3 years at an orchard in eastern Australia.The final nut sets of racemes bagged to exclude insect pollinators were low in all 3 years of the study for both cultivars.This demonstrated the importance of exposure to insect visitors to increase nut set of these cultivars.However, the improved initial nut set by supplementary cross pollination of 246 in all 3 years of the study showed that insect pollination is inefficient compared to hand pollination.Furthermore, supplementary cross pollination of 246 increased final nut set by 57-97 % in 1989 and increased nut weight by 15n0 % and kernel weight by 20n0 % in 1991.Cross pollination of A4 did not result in any consistent pattern of initial nut set and did not improve final nut set, but increased nut weight by 11n6 % and kernel weight by 18n4 %, with a higher percentage kernel recovery in 1991.In addition, supplementary self pollination of A4 increased nut sets in both 1989 and 1990.Yield and quality of both cultivars may benefit from increasing pollen transfer in the orchard.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 74 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The effects of supplementary pollination on initial and final nut set and nut weight of the Macadamia cultivars, ' Hawaii Agricultural Experiment Station 246 ' and ' Hidden Valley A4 ', were assessed over 3 years at an orchard in eastern Australia.The final nut sets of racemes bagged to exclude insect pollinators were low in all 3 years of the study for both cultivars.This demonstrated the importance of exposure to insect visitors to increase nut set of these cultivars.However, the improved initial nut set by supplementary cross pollination of 246 in all 3 years of the study showed that insect pollination is inefficient compared to hand pollination.Furthermore, supplementary cross pollination of 246 increased final nut set by 57-97 % in 1989 and increased nut weight by 15n0 % and kernel weight by 20n0 % in 1991.Cross pollination of A4 did not result in any consistent pattern of initial nut set and did not improve final nut set, but increased nut weight by 11n6 % and kernel weight by 18n4 %, with a higher percentage kernel recovery in 1991.In addition, supplementary self pollination of A4 increased nut sets in both 1989 and 1990.Yield and quality of both cultivars may benefit from increasing pollen transfer in the orchard.

Key concepts: Nut, Pollination, Biology, Macadamia nut, Orchard, Cultivar, Pollinator, Pollen

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Effect of Supplementary Pollination on Nut Set ofMacadamia(Proteaceae) — Research Paper | ScholarLens