Acoustic and surface EMG diagnosis of pediatric muscle disease
Daniel T. Barry, Kevin Gordon, George G. Hinton
Abstract
Open-access reader
Daniel T. Barry, Kevin Gordon, George G. Hinton
Abstract
Open-access reader
The ratio of acoustic myography (AMG) amplitude to surface electromyography (EMG) amplitude is proposed as a measure of mechanical output compared with electrical activity of the contractile system. AMG to EMG ratios were measured from 16 children with muscle disease diagnosed by clinical criteria, EMG, and/or muscle biopsy. These were compared with the ratios from 11 normal volunteers spanning the same age range (7-16 years). AMG to EMG ratios were significantly (P less than 0.01) different for the two populations. Using a linear discriminant function to define the normal range for AMG to EMG ratios yielded a sensitivity of 82% (13 of 16 abnormals diagnosed) and a specificity of 91% (10 of 11 normals). These findings suggest that surface recordings may provide significant diagnostic information in muscle disease. The accuracy may be improved further by using additional muscles (e.g., paraspinals) and evoked twitches.
OpenAlex reports 125 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The ratio of acoustic myography (AMG) amplitude to surface electromyography (EMG) amplitude is proposed as a measure of mechanical output compared with electrical activity of the contractile system. AMG to EMG ratios were measured from 16 children with muscle disease diagnosed by clinical criteria, EMG, and/or muscle biopsy. These were compared with the ratios from 11 normal volunteers spanning the same age range (7-16 years). AMG to EMG ratios were significantly (P less than 0.01) different for the two populations. Using a linear discriminant function to define the normal range for AMG to EMG ratios yielded a sensitivity of 82% (13 of 16 abnormals diagnosed) and a specificity of 91% (10 of 11 normals). These findings suggest that surface recordings may provide significant diagnostic information in muscle disease. The accuracy may be improved further by using additional muscles (e.g., paraspinals) and evoked twitches.
Key concepts: Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Electromyography, Medicine, Muscle disease, Neuromuscular disease, Electrodiagnosis, Physical therapy, Disease