2008•Revista chilena de infectologíaOpen access

Evidencia seroepidemiológica de exposición humana a Anaplasma sp en Santiago, Chile

Katia Abarca V, Javier López Del P, Patricia González A, Jeannette Dabanch P, Marisa Torres, Verónica Solari G, Cecilia Perret P.

Open full text 11 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: To find more evidence of human exposure to Anaplasma sp in Chile, we studied 108 contacts of dogs with canine ehrlichiosis (CE) (risk group) and 61 persons without tick or CE cases contact (control group). A survey including risk factors and history of diseases compatible with ehrlichiosis/ anaplasmosis was applied to the risk group. Serum IgG anti-Anaplasma sp antibodies were determined in both groups. RESULTS: A significant difference was found in the prevalence of anti-Anaplasma sp antibodies in the risk group compared with the control group (18,5 versus 3,3%), p < 0,005. No risk factors associated to seropositivity were found, nor persons with history suggesting ehrlichiosis/anaplasmosis. Ninety four percent of the houses of the risk group had tick infestation. DISCUSSION: A greater risk of exposition to Anaplasma sp is documented in people living in close contact with CE cases and in houses with tick infestation.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: To find more evidence of human exposure to Anaplasma sp in Chile, we studied 108 contacts of dogs with canine ehrlichiosis (CE) (risk group) and 61 persons without tick or CE cases contact (control group). A survey including risk factors and history of diseases compatible with ehrlichiosis/ anaplasmosis was applied to the risk group. Serum IgG anti-Anaplasma sp antibodies were determined in both groups. RESULTS: A significant difference was found in the prevalence of anti-Anaplasma sp antibodies in the risk group compared with the control group (18,5 versus 3,3%), p < 0,005. No risk factors associated to seropositivity were found, nor persons with history suggesting ehrlichiosis/anaplasmosis. Ninety four percent of the houses of the risk group had tick infestation. DISCUSSION: A greater risk of exposition to Anaplasma sp is documented in people living in close contact with CE cases and in houses with tick infestation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: To find more evidence of human exposure to Anaplasma sp in Chile, we studied 108 contacts of dogs with canine ehrlichiosis (CE) (risk group) and 61 persons without tick or CE cases contact (control group). A survey including risk factors and history of diseases compatible with ehrlichiosis/ anaplasmosis was applied to the risk group. Serum IgG anti-Anaplasma sp antibodies were determined in both groups. RESULTS: A significant difference was found in the prevalence of anti-Anaplasma sp antibodies in the risk group compared with the control group (18,5 versus 3,3%), p < 0,005. No risk factors associated to seropositivity were found, nor persons with history suggesting ehrlichiosis/anaplasmosis. Ninety four percent of the houses of the risk group had tick infestation. DISCUSSION: A greater risk of exposition to Anaplasma sp is documented in people living in close contact with CE cases and in houses with tick infestation.

Key concepts: Ehrlichiosis, Anaplasmosis, Anaplasma, Tick infestation, Tick, Veterinary medicine, Ehrlichia, Infestation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evidencia seroepidemiológica de exposición humana a Anaplasma sp en Santiago, Chile — Research Paper | ScholarLens