Evidencia seroepidemiológica de exposición humana a Anaplasma sp en Santiago, Chile
Katia Abarca V, Javier López Del P, Patricia González A, Jeannette Dabanch P, Marisa Torres, Verónica Solari G, Cecilia Perret P.
Abstract
Open-access reader
Katia Abarca V, Javier López Del P, Patricia González A, Jeannette Dabanch P, Marisa Torres, Verónica Solari G, Cecilia Perret P.
Abstract
Open-access reader
OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: To find more evidence of human exposure to Anaplasma sp in Chile, we studied 108 contacts of dogs with canine ehrlichiosis (CE) (risk group) and 61 persons without tick or CE cases contact (control group). A survey including risk factors and history of diseases compatible with ehrlichiosis/ anaplasmosis was applied to the risk group. Serum IgG anti-Anaplasma sp antibodies were determined in both groups. RESULTS: A significant difference was found in the prevalence of anti-Anaplasma sp antibodies in the risk group compared with the control group (18,5 versus 3,3%), p < 0,005. No risk factors associated to seropositivity were found, nor persons with history suggesting ehrlichiosis/anaplasmosis. Ninety four percent of the houses of the risk group had tick infestation. DISCUSSION: A greater risk of exposition to Anaplasma sp is documented in people living in close contact with CE cases and in houses with tick infestation.
OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: To find more evidence of human exposure to Anaplasma sp in Chile, we studied 108 contacts of dogs with canine ehrlichiosis (CE) (risk group) and 61 persons without tick or CE cases contact (control group). A survey including risk factors and history of diseases compatible with ehrlichiosis/ anaplasmosis was applied to the risk group. Serum IgG anti-Anaplasma sp antibodies were determined in both groups. RESULTS: A significant difference was found in the prevalence of anti-Anaplasma sp antibodies in the risk group compared with the control group (18,5 versus 3,3%), p < 0,005. No risk factors associated to seropositivity were found, nor persons with history suggesting ehrlichiosis/anaplasmosis. Ninety four percent of the houses of the risk group had tick infestation. DISCUSSION: A greater risk of exposition to Anaplasma sp is documented in people living in close contact with CE cases and in houses with tick infestation.
Key concepts: Ehrlichiosis, Anaplasmosis, Anaplasma, Tick infestation, Tick, Veterinary medicine, Ehrlichia, Infestation