Social Class and Education in Modern Britain: Why Inequalities Persist and How Can We Explain Them.
Spyros Themelis
Abstract
Spyros Themelis
Abstract
This paper discusses the historical continuity and persistence of educational inequalities I postwar Britain. It shows that despite much policy activity, educational inequalities have never really been the real target of policy action. Rather, a more concrete policy target has been the support of the markets, which were expected to act an equalizing force of the aforementioned inequalities. In such a context, my contention is that inequalities of any sort cannot be reduced without challenging class inequalities, which, in turn, is predicated upon the challenging of the dominant class relations. Insofar as explanations have to be invoked to explain the persistence and salience of educational differentials in attainment and the attendant centrality of social class in these explanations, I suggest that the research interest is turned to the role of the elites and their contribution in the rearrangement of class relations.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This paper discusses the historical continuity and persistence of educational inequalities I postwar Britain. It shows that despite much policy activity, educational inequalities have never really been the real target of policy action. Rather, a more concrete policy target has been the support of the markets, which were expected to act an equalizing force of the aforementioned inequalities. In such a context, my contention is that inequalities of any sort cannot be reduced without challenging class inequalities, which, in turn, is predicated upon the challenging of the dominant class relations. Insofar as explanations have to be invoked to explain the persistence and salience of educational differentials in attainment and the attendant centrality of social class in these explanations, I suggest that the research interest is turned to the role of the elites and their contribution in the rearrangement of class relations.
Key concepts: Inequality, Salience (neuroscience), Sociology, Social class, Positive economics, Class (philosophy), Context (archaeology), Educational attainment