Recognising haemorrhagic rash in children with fever: a survey of parents' knowledge
Marie Aurel, François Dubos, Baptiste Motte, Isabelle Pruvost, F. Leclerc, Alain Martinot
Abstract
Marie Aurel, François Dubos, Baptiste Motte, Isabelle Pruvost, F. Leclerc, Alain Martinot
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Early recognition and treatment of meningococcal disease improves its outcome. Haemorrhagic rash is one of the most specific signs that parents can learn to recognise. OBJECTIVE: To determine the percentage of parents able to recognise a haemorrhagic rash and perform the tumbler test. METHODS: 123 parents of children consulting for mild injuries were interviewed about the significance and recognition of haemorrhagic rash in febrile children. RESULTS: Although 88% of parents undressed their children when they were febrile, it was never to look specifically for a skin rash. Only 7% (95% CI 3% to 12%) were able to recognise a petechial rash and knew the tumbler test. CONCLUSION: Information campaigns about the significance of haemorrhagic rash and about the tumbler test are needed.
OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
BACKGROUND: Early recognition and treatment of meningococcal disease improves its outcome. Haemorrhagic rash is one of the most specific signs that parents can learn to recognise. OBJECTIVE: To determine the percentage of parents able to recognise a haemorrhagic rash and perform the tumbler test. METHODS: 123 parents of children consulting for mild injuries were interviewed about the significance and recognition of haemorrhagic rash in febrile children. RESULTS: Although 88% of parents undressed their children when they were febrile, it was never to look specifically for a skin rash. Only 7% (95% CI 3% to 12%) were able to recognise a petechial rash and knew the tumbler test. CONCLUSION: Information campaigns about the significance of haemorrhagic rash and about the tumbler test are needed.
Key concepts: Rash, Medicine, Petechial rash, Test (biology), Dermatology, Pediatrics, Surgery, Biology