1994Unpublished venueOpen access

The effect of speculatively updating branch history on branch prediction accuracy, revisited

Eric Hao, Po-Yung Chang, Yale N. Patt

Open full text 66 citations

Abstract

Recent research has suggested that the branch history register need not contain the outcomes of the most recent branches in order for the Two-Level Adaptive Branch Predictor to work well. From this result, it is tempting to conclude that the branch history register need not be speculatively updated. This paper revisits this work and explains when the most recent branch outcomes can be omitted without significantly affecting performance. It also explains why this result does not imply that speculative update is not important. This paper shows that because the number of unresolved branches present in the machine varies during program execution, branch predictors without speculative update perform significantly worse than branch predictors with speculative update.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Recent research has suggested that the branch history register need not contain the outcomes of the most recent branches in order for the Two-Level Adaptive Branch Predictor to work well. From this result, it is tempting to conclude that the branch history register need not be speculatively updated. This paper revisits this work and explains when the most recent branch outcomes can be omitted without significantly affecting performance. It also explains why this result does not imply that speculative update is not important. This paper shows that because the number of unresolved branches present in the machine varies during program execution, branch predictors without speculative update perform significantly worse than branch predictors with speculative update.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 66 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Recent research has suggested that the branch history register need not contain the outcomes of the most recent branches in order for the Two-Level Adaptive Branch Predictor to work well. From this result, it is tempting to conclude that the branch history register need not be speculatively updated. This paper revisits this work and explains when the most recent branch outcomes can be omitted without significantly affecting performance. It also explains why this result does not imply that speculative update is not important. This paper shows that because the number of unresolved branches present in the machine varies during program execution, branch predictors without speculative update perform significantly worse than branch predictors with speculative update.

Key concepts: Branch predictor, Speculative execution, Computer science, Out-of-order execution, Speculative multithreading, Work (physics), Register (sociolinguistics), Parallel computing

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The effect of speculatively updating branch history on branch prediction accuracy, revisited — Research Paper | ScholarLens