2015Journal of Lung Pulmonary & Respiratory ResearchRequires access

Spirometric Values in Sitting, Standing and Supine Position

Helee M. Thakar

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

Background: Spirometry may be done either in sitting or standing position. The effect of sitting, standing and supine position on ventilatory functions has not been well studied in healthy subjects. Objective: The objectives of this study were to compare the spirometric values between sitting position and supine/standing position and to find magnitude of change when going from sitting to supine position. Methods: Forty five healthy subjects (30 male and 15 female) with a median age of 21 (range 19-23 years) were asked to perform spirometry in sitting upright position. They were asked to repeat the tests in the standing and supine position after adequate rest and the means of the spirometric tests in the three positions were compared using paired t-tests. Differences declared statistically significant when p-values were less than 0.05. Result: Measurements of FVC, FEV 1 and PEFR was significantly higher in the sitting position compared to standing while there was no significant change in FEF 25-75% . Around 10% of decrease in above spirometric value was found in supine position as compared to sitting position. Conclusion: Spirometry should be done in a position in which the reference values which we are using have been derived. In patients who are not able to sit in order to complete spirometry, the supine position may be preferred but the interpretation would have to be made carefully.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: Spirometry may be done either in sitting or standing position. The effect of sitting, standing and supine position on ventilatory functions has not been well studied in healthy subjects. Objective: The objectives of this study were to compare the spirometric values between sitting position and supine/standing position and to find magnitude of change when going from sitting to supine position. Methods: Forty five healthy subjects (30 male and 15 female) with a median age of 21 (range 19-23 years) were asked to perform spirometry in sitting upright position. They were asked to repeat the tests in the standing and supine position after adequate rest and the means of the spirometric tests in the three positions were compared using paired t-tests. Differences declared statistically significant when p-values were less than 0.05. Result: Measurements of FVC, FEV 1 and PEFR was significantly higher in the sitting position compared to standing while there was no significant change in FEF 25-75% . Around 10% of decrease in above spirometric value was found in supine position as compared to sitting position. Conclusion: Spirometry should be done in a position in which the reference values which we are using have been derived. In patients who are not able to sit in order to complete spirometry, the supine position may be preferred but the interpretation would have to be made carefully.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: Spirometry may be done either in sitting or standing position. The effect of sitting, standing and supine position on ventilatory functions has not been well studied in healthy subjects. Objective: The objectives of this study were to compare the spirometric values between sitting position and supine/standing position and to find magnitude of change when going from sitting to supine position. Methods: Forty five healthy subjects (30 male and 15 female) with a median age of 21 (range 19-23 years) were asked to perform spirometry in sitting upright position. They were asked to repeat the tests in the standing and supine position after adequate rest and the means of the spirometric tests in the three positions were compared using paired t-tests. Differences declared statistically significant when p-values were less than 0.05. Result: Measurements of FVC, FEV 1 and PEFR was significantly higher in the sitting position compared to standing while there was no significant change in FEF 25-75% . Around 10% of decrease in above spirometric value was found in supine position as compared to sitting position. Conclusion: Spirometry should be done in a position in which the reference values which we are using have been derived. In patients who are not able to sit in order to complete spirometry, the supine position may be preferred but the interpretation would have to be made carefully.

Key concepts: Supine position, Sitting, Spirometry, Physical therapy, Medicine, Position (finance), Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Spirometric Values in Sitting, Standing and Supine Position — Research Paper | ScholarLens