2011Respiratory CareOpen access

Potential Inadequacy of Automatic Tube Compensation to Decrease Inspiratory Work Load After at Least 48 Hours of Endotracheal Tube Use in the Clinical Setting

Jun Oto, Hideaki Imanaka, Emiko Nakataki, Rie Ono, Masaji Nishimura

Open full text 20 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endotracheal tubes (ETTs) impose a substantial respiratory work load on mechanically ventilated patients. Automatic tube compensation (ATC) should overcome this flow-dependent resistive work load; however, ETT resistance can be increased by tracheal secretions or ETT deformities. Our bench study investigated whether ATC provides effective respiratory work load relief in used ETTs. METHODS: We enrolled 20 critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation for longer than 48 hours. After extubation, we collected the used ETTs and measured the pressure-time products (PTPs) by using a bellows-in-a-box lung model that simulated spontaneous breathing, at a respiratory rate of 10 breaths/min, inspiratory time of 1.0 s, and tidal volumes (V(T)) of 300 mL, 500 mL, and 700 mL. The ventilator was set at ATC 100% with PEEP of 5 cm H(2)O and F(IO(2)) of 0.21. The flow and airway pressure at the proximal (P(aw)) and distal (P(tr)) ends of the ETT were recorded, and the PTP integrated from P(tr) analyzed. RESULTS: PTP values increased with V(T) during ATC. Even at 100% ATC the ventilator did not completely compensate for the PTP imposed by the ETT. In used ETTs, peak flow and peak P(aw) were lower and PTP values were greater than in new ETTs. As V(T) increased, the percentage difference in the PTP values between the new and used ETTs increased. CONCLUSIONS: ATC does not necessarily compensate for an ETT-imposed respiratory work load. ETT configuration changes and tracheal secretions can increase ETT resistance and decrease the ability of ATC to compensate for the increased respiratory work load.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Endotracheal tubes (ETTs) impose a substantial respiratory work load on mechanically ventilated patients. Automatic tube compensation (ATC) should overcome this flow-dependent resistive work load; however, ETT resistance can be increased by tracheal secretions or ETT deformities. Our bench study investigated whether ATC provides effective respiratory work load relief in used ETTs. METHODS: We enrolled 20 critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation for longer than 48 hours. After extubation, we collected the used ETTs and measured the pressure-time products (PTPs) by using a bellows-in-a-box lung model that simulated spontaneous breathing, at a respiratory rate of 10 breaths/min, inspiratory time of 1.0 s, and tidal volumes (V(T)) of 300 mL, 500 mL, and 700 mL. The ventilator was set at ATC 100% with PEEP of 5 cm H(2)O and F(IO(2)) of 0.21. The flow and airway pressure at the proximal (P(aw)) and distal (P(tr)) ends of the ETT were recorded, and the PTP integrated from P(tr) analyzed. RESULTS: PTP values increased with V(T) during ATC. Even at 100% ATC the ventilator did not completely compensate for the PTP imposed by the ETT. In used ETTs, peak flow and peak P(aw) were lower and PTP values were greater than in new ETTs. As V(T) increased, the percentage difference in the PTP values between the new and used ETTs increased. CONCLUSIONS: ATC does not necessarily compensate for an ETT-imposed respiratory work load. ETT configuration changes and tracheal secretions can increase ETT resistance and decrease the ability of ATC to compensate for the increased respiratory work load.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Endotracheal tubes (ETTs) impose a substantial respiratory work load on mechanically ventilated patients. Automatic tube compensation (ATC) should overcome this flow-dependent resistive work load; however, ETT resistance can be increased by tracheal secretions or ETT deformities. Our bench study investigated whether ATC provides effective respiratory work load relief in used ETTs. METHODS: We enrolled 20 critically ill patients requiring mechanical ventilation for longer than 48 hours. After extubation, we collected the used ETTs and measured the pressure-time products (PTPs) by using a bellows-in-a-box lung model that simulated spontaneous breathing, at a respiratory rate of 10 breaths/min, inspiratory time of 1.0 s, and tidal volumes (V(T)) of 300 mL, 500 mL, and 700 mL. The ventilator was set at ATC 100% with PEEP of 5 cm H(2)O and F(IO(2)) of 0.21. The flow and airway pressure at the proximal (P(aw)) and distal (P(tr)) ends of the ETT were recorded, and the PTP integrated from P(tr) analyzed. RESULTS: PTP values increased with V(T) during ATC. Even at 100% ATC the ventilator did not completely compensate for the PTP imposed by the ETT. In used ETTs, peak flow and peak P(aw) were lower and PTP values were greater than in new ETTs. As V(T) increased, the percentage difference in the PTP values between the new and used ETTs increased. CONCLUSIONS: ATC does not necessarily compensate for an ETT-imposed respiratory work load. ETT configuration changes and tracheal secretions can increase ETT resistance and decrease the ability of ATC to compensate for the increased respiratory work load.

Key concepts: Medicine, Pressure support ventilation, Work of breathing, Endotracheal tube, Anesthesia, Tidal volume, Artificial ventilation, Ventilation (architecture)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Potential Inadequacy of Automatic Tube Compensation to Decrease Inspiratory Work Load After at Least 48 Hours of Endotracheal Tube Use in the Clinical Setting — Research Paper | ScholarLens