1975•Journal of Applied BacteriologyRequires access

Evaluation of Two Simple Assay Methods for Detecting Antibiotic Residues in Chicken and Pig Muscle

Roy Smither

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

Using 2 paper disc assay procedures, Bacillus cereus and Sarcina lutea were challenged with extracts from chicken and pig muscle paste to which various antibiotics had been added. The first method could detect tetracycline, chlortetracycline, oxytetracycline, penicillin, erythromycin, tylosin and virginiamycin at or <1 μg/g of muscle paste, whilst the second method was necessary to detect the remaining 5 antibiotics at this level. Using the first assay procedure, penicillin, zinc bacitracin and the 3 tetracycline compounds could be detected below FAO/WHO maximum permissible levels for meat for human consumption, whilst the second method was necessary to meet requirements for streptomycin, erythromycin and tylosin. Spiramycin could not be detected by either method at the levels permitted by FAO/WHO. The minimum levels of detection obtained for flavomycin, virginiamycin and monensin were 0.2, 0.02 and 0.5–1.0 μg/g, respectively.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Using 2 paper disc assay procedures, Bacillus cereus and Sarcina lutea were challenged with extracts from chicken and pig muscle paste to which various antibiotics had been added. The first method could detect tetracycline, chlortetracycline, oxytetracycline, penicillin, erythromycin, tylosin and virginiamycin at or <1 μg/g of muscle paste, whilst the second method was necessary to detect the remaining 5 antibiotics at this level. Using the first assay procedure, penicillin, zinc bacitracin and the 3 tetracycline compounds could be detected below FAO/WHO maximum permissible levels for meat for human consumption, whilst the second method was necessary to meet requirements for streptomycin, erythromycin and tylosin. Spiramycin could not be detected by either method at the levels permitted by FAO/WHO. The minimum levels of detection obtained for flavomycin, virginiamycin and monensin were 0.2, 0.02 and 0.5–1.0 μg/g, respectively.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Using 2 paper disc assay procedures, Bacillus cereus and Sarcina lutea were challenged with extracts from chicken and pig muscle paste to which various antibiotics had been added. The first method could detect tetracycline, chlortetracycline, oxytetracycline, penicillin, erythromycin, tylosin and virginiamycin at or <1 μg/g of muscle paste, whilst the second method was necessary to detect the remaining 5 antibiotics at this level. Using the first assay procedure, penicillin, zinc bacitracin and the 3 tetracycline compounds could be detected below FAO/WHO maximum permissible levels for meat for human consumption, whilst the second method was necessary to meet requirements for streptomycin, erythromycin and tylosin. Spiramycin could not be detected by either method at the levels permitted by FAO/WHO. The minimum levels of detection obtained for flavomycin, virginiamycin and monensin were 0.2, 0.02 and 0.5–1.0 μg/g, respectively.

Key concepts: Tylosin, Virginiamycin, Chlortetracycline, Oxytetracycline, Spiramycin, Bacitracin, Penicillin, Tetracycline

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of Two Simple Assay Methods for Detecting Antibiotic Residues in Chicken and Pig Muscle — Research Paper | ScholarLens