A method for correction of radiographic errors in serial three-dimensional cephalometry
Rousset Mm, F Simonek, Dubus Jp
Abstract
Rousset Mm, F Simonek, Dubus Jp
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To improve the accuracy of location of anatomical structures in serial three-dimensional (3D) cephalometric radiography. METHODS: A new method was developed to correct for geometrical errors in the calculation of the 3D coordinates of a point viewed on any two of three frontal, lateral and axial cephalometric radiographs. A computer-based method was used to reduce measurement errors. The methods were tested on a phantom containing metallic markers and on a dried skull. RESULTS: The mean corrected geometric error was 0.43 mm (SD 0.25 mm) compared with a maximum of 8 mm (SD 0.2 mm) when calculated directly from the radiographs. The mean computer-based measurement error was 0.46 mm (SD 0.34 mm) compared with 1.38 mm (SD 0.74 mm) when made directly from the radiographs. CONCLUSIONS: The new method for the correction of radiographic errors in 3D serial cephalometric radiography appears to be sufficiently accurate to justify clinical evaluation.
OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVES: To improve the accuracy of location of anatomical structures in serial three-dimensional (3D) cephalometric radiography. METHODS: A new method was developed to correct for geometrical errors in the calculation of the 3D coordinates of a point viewed on any two of three frontal, lateral and axial cephalometric radiographs. A computer-based method was used to reduce measurement errors. The methods were tested on a phantom containing metallic markers and on a dried skull. RESULTS: The mean corrected geometric error was 0.43 mm (SD 0.25 mm) compared with a maximum of 8 mm (SD 0.2 mm) when calculated directly from the radiographs. The mean computer-based measurement error was 0.46 mm (SD 0.34 mm) compared with 1.38 mm (SD 0.74 mm) when made directly from the radiographs. CONCLUSIONS: The new method for the correction of radiographic errors in 3D serial cephalometric radiography appears to be sufficiently accurate to justify clinical evaluation.
Key concepts: Radiography, Cephalometry, Imaging phantom, Orthodontics, Skull, Nuclear medicine, Medicine, Radiology