1979Journal of Career DevelopmentRequires access

A Model for Evaluating Career Education Curriculum Infusion

G. B. Jones

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

research interests and current activities emphasize these areas: (1) improved planning and accountability models and techniques for human services programs; (2) competency-based training of human services personnel; (3) strategies for increasing citizen impact on government policies and services. The work discussed in this article was supported by a contract from the United States Office of Education to the American Institutes for Research. The opinions expressed are solely those of the author. The 18-task statement presented as Display 1 on the next page represents one approach for systematically evaluating the procedures and effects of implementing career education through the curriculum. Because it concentrates on what students are receiving in the way of career education in classrooms as well as on what influence activi-ties and materials have on them it does not address such evaluation issues as why or how the curriculum changes occurred or the nature of

About this research paper

What this paper is about

research interests and current activities emphasize these areas: (1) improved planning and accountability models and techniques for human services programs; (2) competency-based training of human services personnel; (3) strategies for increasing citizen impact on government policies and services. The work discussed in this article was supported by a contract from the United States Office of Education to the American Institutes for Research. The opinions expressed are solely those of the author. The 18-task statement presented as Display 1 on the next page represents one approach for systematically evaluating the procedures and effects of implementing career education through the curriculum. Because it concentrates on what students are receiving in the way of career education in classrooms as well as on what influence activi-ties and materials have on them it does not address such evaluation issues as why or how the curriculum changes occurred or the nature of

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

research interests and current activities emphasize these areas: (1) improved planning and accountability models and techniques for human services programs; (2) competency-based training of human services personnel; (3) strategies for increasing citizen impact on government policies and services. The work discussed in this article was supported by a contract from the United States Office of Education to the American Institutes for Research. The opinions expressed are solely those of the author. The 18-task statement presented as Display 1 on the next page represents one approach for systematically evaluating the procedures and effects of implementing career education through the curriculum. Because it concentrates on what students are receiving in the way of career education in classrooms as well as on what influence activi-ties and materials have on them it does not address such evaluation issues as why or how the curriculum changes occurred or the nature of

Key concepts: Career education, Curriculum, Career development, Psychology, Pedagogy, Medical education, Career counseling, Curriculum development

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Model for Evaluating Career Education Curriculum Infusion — Research Paper | ScholarLens