Leading- and trailing-edge flaps on supersonic delta wings
Gloria Hernandez, Richard M. Wood, Robert Collins
Abstract
Gloria Hernandez, Richard M. Wood, Robert Collins
Abstract
An experimental investigation has been conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of leading- and trailing-edge flaps on a flat wing and a cambered wing at supersonic speeds. Experimental testing was conducted at Mach numbers of 1.6,1.8, 2.0, and 2.16. The study geometry consisted of a clipped delta planform with leading edge swept back 50 deg and trailing edge swept forward 25 deg. Both wings were attached to a generic fuselage and both were configured with identical leading- and trailing-edge flaps. Analysis of the data showed that flap effects are similar for both flat and cambered wings for all aerodynamic parameters. The drag penalty with trailing-edge deflections is lower for the cambered wing compared to the flat wing. The drag penalty on the cambered wing, however, is higher with leading-edge deflections compared to the flat wing. Lift values for the trailing-edge deflections were slightly lower for the cambered wing. Both wings experienced a decrement in lift loss as the Mach number increased. The values for the pitching-moment increments are slightly larger on the flat wing with trailing-edge deflections and smaller on the same wing with leading-edge deflections when compared to the cambered wing.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
An experimental investigation has been conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of leading- and trailing-edge flaps on a flat wing and a cambered wing at supersonic speeds. Experimental testing was conducted at Mach numbers of 1.6,1.8, 2.0, and 2.16. The study geometry consisted of a clipped delta planform with leading edge swept back 50 deg and trailing edge swept forward 25 deg. Both wings were attached to a generic fuselage and both were configured with identical leading- and trailing-edge flaps. Analysis of the data showed that flap effects are similar for both flat and cambered wings for all aerodynamic parameters. The drag penalty with trailing-edge deflections is lower for the cambered wing compared to the flat wing. The drag penalty on the cambered wing, however, is higher with leading-edge deflections compared to the flat wing. Lift values for the trailing-edge deflections were slightly lower for the cambered wing. Both wings experienced a decrement in lift loss as the Mach number increased. The values for the pitching-moment increments are slightly larger on the flat wing with trailing-edge deflections and smaller on the same wing with leading-edge deflections when compared to the cambered wing.
Key concepts: Delta wing, Supersonic speed, Trailing edge, Aerospace engineering, Leading edge, Angle of attack, Geology, Mechanics