2003•Unpublished venueRequires access

Legal Aid and Self-Representation in the Family Court of Australia

Rosemary Hunter, Jeff Giddings, April Chrzanowski

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

A considerable amount of research has now been undertaken in response to the emerging phenomenon of self-represented litigants in the Family Court. Some of this research has been concerned with the impact of legal aid cuts. Other studies have documented how the presence of self-represented litigants impacts on participants in Family Court processes. A third group of studies are those addressing how courts might best accommodate self-represented litigants. This study is the first research to focus in a sustained way on the link between self-representation and the availability of legal aid funding in family law, to employ both quantitative and qualitative approaches to the question, and to gather information from both self-representing litigants and Legal Aid Commissions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A considerable amount of research has now been undertaken in response to the emerging phenomenon of self-represented litigants in the Family Court. Some of this research has been concerned with the impact of legal aid cuts. Other studies have documented how the presence of self-represented litigants impacts on participants in Family Court processes. A third group of studies are those addressing how courts might best accommodate self-represented litigants. This study is the first research to focus in a sustained way on the link between self-representation and the availability of legal aid funding in family law, to employ both quantitative and qualitative approaches to the question, and to gather information from both self-representing litigants and Legal Aid Commissions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A considerable amount of research has now been undertaken in response to the emerging phenomenon of self-represented litigants in the Family Court. Some of this research has been concerned with the impact of legal aid cuts. Other studies have documented how the presence of self-represented litigants impacts on participants in Family Court processes. A third group of studies are those addressing how courts might best accommodate self-represented litigants. This study is the first research to focus in a sustained way on the link between self-representation and the availability of legal aid funding in family law, to employ both quantitative and qualitative approaches to the question, and to gather information from both self-representing litigants and Legal Aid Commissions.

Key concepts: Representation (politics), Phenomenon, Self representation, Law, Political science, Legal research, Epistemology, Politics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Legal Aid and Self-Representation in the Family Court of Australia — Research Paper | ScholarLens