2013ProceedingsRequires access

Felt Seismicity Related to Hydraulic Fracturing

A. M. Baig, T. Urbancic, G. Viegas

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Hydraulic fracturing is well known to generate seismic events; most are very small magnitude (M <0) and are of great use to delineate geometry or fractures and potentially outline the effective stimulation volume. However, there have been increasing numbers of reports of larger magnitude seismicity. In this presentation, we discuss the instrumentation aspects of properly recording these larger magnitude events. We discuss a case study where seismicity was recorded by a near-surface network of 4.5 Hz geophones and force-balanced accelerometers that corresponded to events up to moment magnitudes of 3, large enough to both be felt on surface and be recorded by distance regional seismic stations up to 100 km away. The presence of these events has implications for previous microseismic studies where generally high-frequency (15Hz) geophones were employed. In these cases, the magnitudes of large events together with parameters like the rupture radius will be systematically underestimated. This saturation will cause underestimation of discrete fracture network dimensions activated during the fracture. Events in the case study can have size dimensions in the range of hundreds of meters, have dramatic effects on the interpretation issues like migration of frac fluids and proper targeting of formations.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Hydraulic fracturing is well known to generate seismic events; most are very small magnitude (M <0) and are of great use to delineate geometry or fractures and potentially outline the effective stimulation volume. However, there have been increasing numbers of reports of larger magnitude seismicity. In this presentation, we discuss the instrumentation aspects of properly recording these larger magnitude events. We discuss a case study where seismicity was recorded by a near-surface network of 4.5 Hz geophones and force-balanced accelerometers that corresponded to events up to moment magnitudes of 3, large enough to both be felt on surface and be recorded by distance regional seismic stations up to 100 km away. The presence of these events has implications for previous microseismic studies where generally high-frequency (15Hz) geophones were employed. In these cases, the magnitudes of large events together with parameters like the rupture radius will be systematically underestimated. This saturation will cause underestimation of discrete fracture network dimensions activated during the fracture. Events in the case study can have size dimensions in the range of hundreds of meters, have dramatic effects on the interpretation issues like migration of frac fluids and proper targeting of formations.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Hydraulic fracturing is well known to generate seismic events; most are very small magnitude (M <0) and are of great use to delineate geometry or fractures and potentially outline the effective stimulation volume. However, there have been increasing numbers of reports of larger magnitude seismicity. In this presentation, we discuss the instrumentation aspects of properly recording these larger magnitude events. We discuss a case study where seismicity was recorded by a near-surface network of 4.5 Hz geophones and force-balanced accelerometers that corresponded to events up to moment magnitudes of 3, large enough to both be felt on surface and be recorded by distance regional seismic stations up to 100 km away. The presence of these events has implications for previous microseismic studies where generally high-frequency (15Hz) geophones were employed. In these cases, the magnitudes of large events together with parameters like the rupture radius will be systematically underestimated. This saturation will cause underestimation of discrete fracture network dimensions activated during the fracture. Events in the case study can have size dimensions in the range of hundreds of meters, have dramatic effects on the interpretation issues like migration of frac fluids and proper targeting of formations.

Key concepts: Geophone, Induced seismicity, Microseism, Seismology, Magnitude (astronomy), Hydraulic fracturing, Geology, Seismic moment

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Felt Seismicity Related to Hydraulic Fracturing — Research Paper | ScholarLens