1998•Journal of Clinical MicrobiologyOpen access

Screening of Stool Samples for Identification of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus Isolates Should Include the Methyl-α- d Glucopyranoside Test To Differentiate Nonmotile Enterococcus gallinarum from E. faecium

Christine Y. Turenne, Daryl J. Hoban, James A. Karlowsky, George G. Zhanel, Amin M Kabani

Open full text 26 citations

Abstract

The methyl-alpha-D-glucopyranoside (MDG) test has been shown to be superior to motility testing in differentiating Enterococcus faecium from E. gallinarum. In the present study, 33 vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE) isolates collected as part of a stool surveillance study were compared by using motility and MDG. Motility testing identified all 33 isolates as E. faecium, whereas MDG identified 11 of the 33 isolates as nonmotile E. gallinarum. The MDG results were confirmed by sequencing the 16S rDNA V6-to-V8 region. We conclude that the MDG test is a necessary component of routine VRE screening.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The methyl-alpha-D-glucopyranoside (MDG) test has been shown to be superior to motility testing in differentiating Enterococcus faecium from E. gallinarum. In the present study, 33 vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE) isolates collected as part of a stool surveillance study were compared by using motility and MDG. Motility testing identified all 33 isolates as E. faecium, whereas MDG identified 11 of the 33 isolates as nonmotile E. gallinarum. The MDG results were confirmed by sequencing the 16S rDNA V6-to-V8 region. We conclude that the MDG test is a necessary component of routine VRE screening.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 26 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The methyl-alpha-D-glucopyranoside (MDG) test has been shown to be superior to motility testing in differentiating Enterococcus faecium from E. gallinarum. In the present study, 33 vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE) isolates collected as part of a stool surveillance study were compared by using motility and MDG. Motility testing identified all 33 isolates as E. faecium, whereas MDG identified 11 of the 33 isolates as nonmotile E. gallinarum. The MDG results were confirmed by sequencing the 16S rDNA V6-to-V8 region. We conclude that the MDG test is a necessary component of routine VRE screening.

Key concepts: Enterococcus faecium, Enterococcus, Microbiology, Biology, Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus, Vancomycin, Streptococcaceae, Feces

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Screening of Stool Samples for Identification of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus Isolates Should Include the Methyl-α- d Glucopyranoside Test To Differentiate Nonmotile Enterococcus gallinarum from E. faecium — Research Paper | ScholarLens