2009Iranian Red Crescent Medical JournalRequires access

THE VALUE OF IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL MARKERS IN PLEOMORPHIC ADENOMA AND ADENOID CYSTIC CARCINOMA OF THE SALIVARY GLAND

Mohammad Javad Ashraf, Negar Azarpira, Bijan Khademi, S Shaghasemi, Narges Bagheri

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Background: In recent years, immunohistochemical markers have provided considerable contribution to salivary gland tumor diagnosis and classification. The aim of this study was to evaluate diagnostic value of various cytokeratin markers and smooth muscle actin (SMA) in differential diagnosis of pleomorphic adenoma (PA) and adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC). Methods: In this retrospective study, 35 cases of salivary gland tumors composed of 19 PA and 16 ACC were selected and immunohistochemical staining with six cytokeratin markers (CK7, CK8, CK13, CK14, CK17 and CK18) and SMA were performed. The positivity of these markers in both typical and atypical areas of each tumor was compared. Positivity was defined if 10% or more of the cells were immunostained. Results: In the PA group, there was no difference between luminal and stromal expression of CK7, CK 8, CK 13, CK 14, CK 17, and CK 18 in both typical and atypical areas except SMA that was not expressed in the atypical area. No statistically significant differences were found between the expression of CK7, CK 8, CK 14 and CK 18 in both typical and atypical areas of ACC group, with no expression of SMA in atypical area. Conclusion: It seems that the immunoprofile of the atypical area of both PA and ACC are similar to each other and IHC does not help to differentiate them.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Background: In recent years, immunohistochemical markers have provided considerable contribution to salivary gland tumor diagnosis and classification. The aim of this study was to evaluate diagnostic value of various cytokeratin markers and smooth muscle actin (SMA) in differential diagnosis of pleomorphic adenoma (PA) and adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC). Methods: In this retrospective study, 35 cases of salivary gland tumors composed of 19 PA and 16 ACC were selected and immunohistochemical staining with six cytokeratin markers (CK7, CK8, CK13, CK14, CK17 and CK18) and SMA were performed. The positivity of these markers in both typical and atypical areas of each tumor was compared. Positivity was defined if 10% or more of the cells were immunostained. Results: In the PA group, there was no difference between luminal and stromal expression of CK7, CK 8, CK 13, CK 14, CK 17, and CK 18 in both typical and atypical areas except SMA that was not expressed in the atypical area. No statistically significant differences were found between the expression of CK7, CK 8, CK 14 and CK 18 in both typical and atypical areas of ACC group, with no expression of SMA in atypical area. Conclusion: It seems that the immunoprofile of the atypical area of both PA and ACC are similar to each other and IHC does not help to differentiate them.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Background: In recent years, immunohistochemical markers have provided considerable contribution to salivary gland tumor diagnosis and classification. The aim of this study was to evaluate diagnostic value of various cytokeratin markers and smooth muscle actin (SMA) in differential diagnosis of pleomorphic adenoma (PA) and adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC). Methods: In this retrospective study, 35 cases of salivary gland tumors composed of 19 PA and 16 ACC were selected and immunohistochemical staining with six cytokeratin markers (CK7, CK8, CK13, CK14, CK17 and CK18) and SMA were performed. The positivity of these markers in both typical and atypical areas of each tumor was compared. Positivity was defined if 10% or more of the cells were immunostained. Results: In the PA group, there was no difference between luminal and stromal expression of CK7, CK 8, CK 13, CK 14, CK 17, and CK 18 in both typical and atypical areas except SMA that was not expressed in the atypical area. No statistically significant differences were found between the expression of CK7, CK 8, CK 14 and CK 18 in both typical and atypical areas of ACC group, with no expression of SMA in atypical area. Conclusion: It seems that the immunoprofile of the atypical area of both PA and ACC are similar to each other and IHC does not help to differentiate them.

Key concepts: Cytokeratin, Adenoid cystic carcinoma, Pathology, Immunohistochemistry, Salivary gland, Medicine, Pleomorphic adenoma, Differential diagnosis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
THE VALUE OF IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL MARKERS IN PLEOMORPHIC ADENOMA AND ADENOID CYSTIC CARCINOMA OF THE SALIVARY GLAND — Research Paper | ScholarLens