2012•Citizenship StudiesRequires access

Multiculturalism and the politics of belonging: the puzzle of multiculturalism in South Korea

Nora Hui‐Jung Kim

Open publisher page 58 citations

Abstract

South Korea has experienced transformations in both discourse and policy regarding multiculturalism in recent years. The new discourse on multiculturalism implies that Korea is becoming, or should become, a multicultural society. This development can be viewed as an opportunity for migrants to take advantage of the dialogue about multiculturalism. However, migrants in Korea are indifferent to, and even critical of, the new discourse. The goal of this article is to explain this apparent paradox by examining the implications of Korean multiculturalism on multiple aspects of citizenship. Migrants in Korea are critical of multiculturalism because the characteristics of their group identities as defined in multiculturalism are less than desirable. To a certain extent, this unfair representation discourages migrants in Korea not only from welcoming multiculturalism but also from seeking formal membership. In this sense, the Korean case suggests the relationship between the status and identity aspects of citizenship is predominantly concurrent rather than sequential and the offer of fair representation must be addressed in conjunction with, not after, the issue of formal membership.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

South Korea has experienced transformations in both discourse and policy regarding multiculturalism in recent years. The new discourse on multiculturalism implies that Korea is becoming, or should become, a multicultural society. This development can be viewed as an opportunity for migrants to take advantage of the dialogue about multiculturalism. However, migrants in Korea are indifferent to, and even critical of, the new discourse. The goal of this article is to explain this apparent paradox by examining the implications of Korean multiculturalism on multiple aspects of citizenship. Migrants in Korea are critical of multiculturalism because the characteristics of their group identities as defined in multiculturalism are less than desirable. To a certain extent, this unfair representation discourages migrants in Korea not only from welcoming multiculturalism but also from seeking formal membership. In this sense, the Korean case suggests the relationship between the status and identity aspects of citizenship is predominantly concurrent rather than sequential and the offer of fair representation must be addressed in conjunction with, not after, the issue of formal membership.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 58 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

South Korea has experienced transformations in both discourse and policy regarding multiculturalism in recent years. The new discourse on multiculturalism implies that Korea is becoming, or should become, a multicultural society. This development can be viewed as an opportunity for migrants to take advantage of the dialogue about multiculturalism. However, migrants in Korea are indifferent to, and even critical of, the new discourse. The goal of this article is to explain this apparent paradox by examining the implications of Korean multiculturalism on multiple aspects of citizenship. Migrants in Korea are critical of multiculturalism because the characteristics of their group identities as defined in multiculturalism are less than desirable. To a certain extent, this unfair representation discourages migrants in Korea not only from welcoming multiculturalism but also from seeking formal membership. In this sense, the Korean case suggests the relationship between the status and identity aspects of citizenship is predominantly concurrent rather than sequential and the offer of fair representation must be addressed in conjunction with, not after, the issue of formal membership.

Key concepts: Multiculturalism, Citizenship, Politics, Identity (music), Gender studies, Sociology, Representation (politics), Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Multiculturalism and the politics of belonging: the puzzle of multiculturalism in South Korea — Research Paper | ScholarLens