TERMS FOR NATURAL DEDUCTION, SEQUENT CALCULUS AND CUT ELIMINATION IN CLASSICAL LOGIC
Silvia Ghilezan
Abstract
Silvia Ghilezan
Abstract
This paper revisits the results of Barendregt and Ghilezan (3) and generalizes them for classical logic. Instead of �-calculus, we use here �µ-calculus as the basic term cal- culus. We consider two extensionally equivalent type assignment systems for �µ-calculus, one corresponding to classical natural deduction, and the other to classical sequent cal- culus. Their relations and normalisation properties are investigated. As a consequence a short proof of Cut elimination theorem is obtained.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This paper revisits the results of Barendregt and Ghilezan (3) and generalizes them for classical logic. Instead of �-calculus, we use here �µ-calculus as the basic term cal- culus. We consider two extensionally equivalent type assignment systems for �µ-calculus, one corresponding to classical natural deduction, and the other to classical sequent cal- culus. Their relations and normalisation properties are investigated. As a consequence a short proof of Cut elimination theorem is obtained.
Key concepts: Natural deduction, Sequent calculus, Sequent, Cut-elimination theorem, Calculus (dental), Mathematics, Curry–Howard correspondence, Proof calculus