2011•Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses AssociationRequires access

Evidence-Based Practice Principles

Michael J. Rice

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

Clinicians providing psychiatric care are often faced with selecting interventions in areas of care for which there is limited scientific support, such as the information on traumatic stress responses and integrated care interventions. If they adhere to the principles of evidence-based practice (EBP), the lack of scientific support should not hamper clinicians from implementing the best EBP intervention. EBP interventions can be drawn from the literature provided clinicians accurately appraise the level of existing scientific knowledge. Regardless of the level of evidence, clinicians must discuss the recommended intervention, risks, benefits, and alternatives to achieve the best EBP outcome.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Clinicians providing psychiatric care are often faced with selecting interventions in areas of care for which there is limited scientific support, such as the information on traumatic stress responses and integrated care interventions. If they adhere to the principles of evidence-based practice (EBP), the lack of scientific support should not hamper clinicians from implementing the best EBP intervention. EBP interventions can be drawn from the literature provided clinicians accurately appraise the level of existing scientific knowledge. Regardless of the level of evidence, clinicians must discuss the recommended intervention, risks, benefits, and alternatives to achieve the best EBP outcome.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Clinicians providing psychiatric care are often faced with selecting interventions in areas of care for which there is limited scientific support, such as the information on traumatic stress responses and integrated care interventions. If they adhere to the principles of evidence-based practice (EBP), the lack of scientific support should not hamper clinicians from implementing the best EBP intervention. EBP interventions can be drawn from the literature provided clinicians accurately appraise the level of existing scientific knowledge. Regardless of the level of evidence, clinicians must discuss the recommended intervention, risks, benefits, and alternatives to achieve the best EBP outcome.

Key concepts: Psychological intervention, Intervention (counseling), Scientific evidence, Evidence-based practice, Best practice, Evidence-based medicine, MEDLINE, Scientific literature

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evidence-Based Practice Principles — Research Paper | ScholarLens