Maximizing genetic response in crossbreds using both purebred and crossbred information
Ming Wei, J. H. J. van der Werf
Abstract
Ming Wei, J. H. J. van der Werf
Abstract
Abstract A combined crossbred and purebred selection (CCPS) method, i.e. using crossbred and purebred information, was proposed to achieve genetic response in crossbred animals. Selection index theory was applied to establish a CCPS index. The CCPS was compared with pure-line selection (PLS) and crossbred selection (CS) methods. The genetic correlation between purebred and crossbred performance (r pc ) and crossbred heritability (h c 2 ) are crucial factors in the comparison. The CCPS is always better than PLS or CS when a fixed number of purebred progeny is tested. With a fixed total number of purebred and crossbred tested progeny, CCPS is only worse than PLS for very high values of rpc (>0·8). Superiority of CCPS over PLS increases and over CS decreases with decreasing r pc . The larger h c 2 is, relative to purebred heritability (h c 2 the more response CS and CCPS will achieve. The robustness of CCPS against inappropriate assumptions on r pc and h c 2 values was investigated. The expected response is always an overestimate, and the actual response is smaller than the optimal response when r pc is assumed one but the true r pc is smaller. The difference between actual and optimal response increases as r pc decreases but it is small for large r pc values (e.g. <3% for r pc >0·7). The expected response is smaller than the actual response when r pc is large and h c 2 > h p 2 Finally, the actual response to CCPS is larger than the optimal response to PLS for positive values for r pc . The main conclusions are: (1) CCPS method is optimal for obtaining genetic response in crossbreds; and (2) CCPS with inappropriate assumptions on r pc and h c 2 values (e.g. recognizing crossbreds as purebreds) achieves more genetic response than PLS for common values of r pc and crossbred heritability.
OpenAlex reports 130 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract A combined crossbred and purebred selection (CCPS) method, i.e. using crossbred and purebred information, was proposed to achieve genetic response in crossbred animals. Selection index theory was applied to establish a CCPS index. The CCPS was compared with pure-line selection (PLS) and crossbred selection (CS) methods. The genetic correlation between purebred and crossbred performance (r pc ) and crossbred heritability (h c 2 ) are crucial factors in the comparison. The CCPS is always better than PLS or CS when a fixed number of purebred progeny is tested. With a fixed total number of purebred and crossbred tested progeny, CCPS is only worse than PLS for very high values of rpc (>0·8). Superiority of CCPS over PLS increases and over CS decreases with decreasing r pc . The larger h c 2 is, relative to purebred heritability (h c 2 the more response CS and CCPS will achieve. The robustness of CCPS against inappropriate assumptions on r pc and h c 2 values was investigated. The expected response is always an overestimate, and the actual response is smaller than the optimal response when r pc is assumed one but the true r pc is smaller. The difference between actual and optimal response increases as r pc decreases but it is small for large r pc values (e.g. <3% for r pc >0·7). The expected response is smaller than the actual response when r pc is large and h c 2 > h p 2 Finally, the actual response to CCPS is larger than the optimal response to PLS for positive values for r pc . The main conclusions are: (1) CCPS method is optimal for obtaining genetic response in crossbreds; and (2) CCPS with inappropriate assumptions on r pc and h c 2 values (e.g. recognizing crossbreds as purebreds) achieves more genetic response than PLS for common values of r pc and crossbred heritability.
Key concepts: Purebred, Crossbreed, Heritability, Selection (genetic algorithm), Animal science, Genetic correlation, Mathematics, Statistics