1988•The Journal of Clinical PharmacologyRequires access

Ketoprofen, Ibuprofen, and Placebo in the Treatment of Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Double‐Blind Crossover Comparison

Donald R. Mehlisch

Open publisher page 30 citations

Abstract

Under double-blind, crossover conditions, 43 women with primary dysmenorrhea received ketoprofen, ibuprofen, and placebo during three consecutive menstrual cycles. Pain intensity and pain relief were determined before and for 6 hours after the loading dose (ketoprofen 150 mg, ibuprofen 800 mg) and before and 2 hours after the maintenance dose (ketoprofen 75 mg, ibuprofen 400 mg). Mean pain intensity difference and pain relief scores consistently indicated greater pain relief after the loading doses of ketoprofen and ibuprofen than after placebo. Significant (P less than 0.05) mean changes that were measured by 13 indices of analgesia after the loading doses of both ketoprofen and ibuprofen indicated greater efficacy for the active treatments than for placebo. The patients' global evaluations after the loading doses were significantly (P less than 0.05) better for the active treatments than for placebo. The efficacy results were similar after the maintenance doses. The rates of a "good" to "excellent" response were 77% for ketoprofen, 73% for ibuprofen, and 35% for placebo. Ketoprofen and ibuprofen were equally well tolerated, the most frequent adverse experiences being gastrointestinal symptoms for ketoprofen and central nervous system side effects for ibuprofen.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Under double-blind, crossover conditions, 43 women with primary dysmenorrhea received ketoprofen, ibuprofen, and placebo during three consecutive menstrual cycles. Pain intensity and pain relief were determined before and for 6 hours after the loading dose (ketoprofen 150 mg, ibuprofen 800 mg) and before and 2 hours after the maintenance dose (ketoprofen 75 mg, ibuprofen 400 mg). Mean pain intensity difference and pain relief scores consistently indicated greater pain relief after the loading doses of ketoprofen and ibuprofen than after placebo. Significant (P less than 0.05) mean changes that were measured by 13 indices of analgesia after the loading doses of both ketoprofen and ibuprofen indicated greater efficacy for the active treatments than for placebo. The patients' global evaluations after the loading doses were significantly (P less than 0.05) better for the active treatments than for placebo. The efficacy results were similar after the maintenance doses. The rates of a "good" to "excellent" response were 77% for ketoprofen, 73% for ibuprofen, and 35% for placebo. Ketoprofen and ibuprofen were equally well tolerated, the most frequent adverse experiences being gastrointestinal symptoms for ketoprofen and central nervous system side effects for ibuprofen.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 30 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Under double-blind, crossover conditions, 43 women with primary dysmenorrhea received ketoprofen, ibuprofen, and placebo during three consecutive menstrual cycles. Pain intensity and pain relief were determined before and for 6 hours after the loading dose (ketoprofen 150 mg, ibuprofen 800 mg) and before and 2 hours after the maintenance dose (ketoprofen 75 mg, ibuprofen 400 mg). Mean pain intensity difference and pain relief scores consistently indicated greater pain relief after the loading doses of ketoprofen and ibuprofen than after placebo. Significant (P less than 0.05) mean changes that were measured by 13 indices of analgesia after the loading doses of both ketoprofen and ibuprofen indicated greater efficacy for the active treatments than for placebo. The patients' global evaluations after the loading doses were significantly (P less than 0.05) better for the active treatments than for placebo. The efficacy results were similar after the maintenance doses. The rates of a "good" to "excellent" response were 77% for ketoprofen, 73% for ibuprofen, and 35% for placebo. Ketoprofen and ibuprofen were equally well tolerated, the most frequent adverse experiences being gastrointestinal symptoms for ketoprofen and central nervous system side effects for ibuprofen.

Key concepts: Ketoprofen, Ibuprofen, Placebo, Medicine, Crossover study, Anesthesia, Adverse effect, Analgesic

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Ketoprofen, Ibuprofen, and Placebo in the Treatment of Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Double‐Blind Crossover Comparison — Research Paper | ScholarLens