2013International Journal of Structural Stability and DynamicsRequires access

CAPABILITY TO CAPTURE DYNAMIC LOADING IN LINEAR DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF SINGLE DEGREE OF FREEDOM SYSTEMS

Shuenn‐Yih Chang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In this work, the importance of the capability to capture dynamic loading for an integration method is emphasized. In a step-by-step integration procedure, amplitude distortions in the transient and steady-state responses depend on the step discretization error of dynamic loading for each time step. Correlations between amplitude distortion and step discretization error for dynamic loadings are analytically established for a specified integration method. These correlations may be considered as the basic numerical properties in evaluating a step-by-step integration method. As a result, the superiority of the previously published algorithm (PPA) [S. Y. Chang, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng.77(8) (2009) 1100–1120] over its modified form and the member of Newmark family method (MNM) with β = γ = 1/2 in capturing dynamic loading is analytically verified (even though the three algorithms have exactly the same characteristic equation).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this work, the importance of the capability to capture dynamic loading for an integration method is emphasized. In a step-by-step integration procedure, amplitude distortions in the transient and steady-state responses depend on the step discretization error of dynamic loading for each time step. Correlations between amplitude distortion and step discretization error for dynamic loadings are analytically established for a specified integration method. These correlations may be considered as the basic numerical properties in evaluating a step-by-step integration method. As a result, the superiority of the previously published algorithm (PPA) [S. Y. Chang, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng.77(8) (2009) 1100–1120] over its modified form and the member of Newmark family method (MNM) with β = γ = 1/2 in capturing dynamic loading is analytically verified (even though the three algorithms have exactly the same characteristic equation).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this work, the importance of the capability to capture dynamic loading for an integration method is emphasized. In a step-by-step integration procedure, amplitude distortions in the transient and steady-state responses depend on the step discretization error of dynamic loading for each time step. Correlations between amplitude distortion and step discretization error for dynamic loadings are analytically established for a specified integration method. These correlations may be considered as the basic numerical properties in evaluating a step-by-step integration method. As a result, the superiority of the previously published algorithm (PPA) [S. Y. Chang, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng.77(8) (2009) 1100–1120] over its modified form and the member of Newmark family method (MNM) with β = γ = 1/2 in capturing dynamic loading is analytically verified (even though the three algorithms have exactly the same characteristic equation).

Key concepts: Discretization, Numerical integration, Transient (computer programming), Distortion (music), Newmark-beta method, Dynamic problem, Amplitude, Dynamic equation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
CAPABILITY TO CAPTURE DYNAMIC LOADING IN LINEAR DYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF SINGLE DEGREE OF FREEDOM SYSTEMS — Research Paper | ScholarLens