2003Microbial Drug ResistanceRequires access

Macrolide Resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolated from Patients with Community-Acquired Lower Respiratory Tract Infections in Portugal: Results of a 3-Year (1999-2001) Multicenter Surveillance Study

José Melo‐Cristino, Mário Ramirez, N Serrano, Thomas Hänscheid

Open publisher page 24 citations

Abstract

A nationwide multicenter study (including 31 laboratories) of the antimicrobial susceptibility of 1210 Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates from patients with community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) was carried out over 3 years (1999-2001) in Portugal. Testing of all isolates was undertaken in a central laboratory. Overall macrolide resistance was 13.1%. Decreased susceptibility to penicillin was 24.5% (15.5% low-level and 9.0% high-level resistance). Taken into consideration, the resistance rates reported in a previous surveillance study of 1989-1993, a six-fold increase of erythromycin resistance in the last decade was documented. Resistance to erythromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin was higher in pediatric patients than in adults. The overwhelming majority (82.3%) of macrolide-resistant isolates were multidrug resistant, although 44.9% were fully susceptible to penicillin. Most macrolide-resistant isolates (80.4%) showed the MLSB phenotype (76.6% MLSB-constitutive resistance, and 3.8% MLSB-inducible resistance) and were also resistant to clindamycin, tetracycline, and co-trimoxazole. The M phenotype was seen in 19.6% isolates and these had MIC90 values of 8 mg/L for erythromycin and clarithromycin, and of 12 mg/L for azithromycin. The clinical significance of macrolide resistance in the management of LRTI is discussed. Because of the specific situation concerning macrolide resistance described in S. pneumoniae, careful use of macrolide antibiotics in therapy and cautious monitoring of macrolide resistance should be continued in Portugal.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A nationwide multicenter study (including 31 laboratories) of the antimicrobial susceptibility of 1210 Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates from patients with community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) was carried out over 3 years (1999-2001) in Portugal. Testing of all isolates was undertaken in a central laboratory. Overall macrolide resistance was 13.1%. Decreased susceptibility to penicillin was 24.5% (15.5% low-level and 9.0% high-level resistance). Taken into consideration, the resistance rates reported in a previous surveillance study of 1989-1993, a six-fold increase of erythromycin resistance in the last decade was documented. Resistance to erythromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin was higher in pediatric patients than in adults. The overwhelming majority (82.3%) of macrolide-resistant isolates were multidrug resistant, although 44.9% were fully susceptible to penicillin. Most macrolide-resistant isolates (80.4%) showed the MLSB phenotype (76.6% MLSB-constitutive resistance, and 3.8% MLSB-inducible resistance) and were also resistant to clindamycin, tetracycline, and co-trimoxazole. The M phenotype was seen in 19.6% isolates and these had MIC90 values of 8 mg/L for erythromycin and clarithromycin, and of 12 mg/L for azithromycin. The clinical significance of macrolide resistance in the management of LRTI is discussed. Because of the specific situation concerning macrolide resistance described in S. pneumoniae, careful use of macrolide antibiotics in therapy and cautious monitoring of macrolide resistance should be continued in Portugal.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 24 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A nationwide multicenter study (including 31 laboratories) of the antimicrobial susceptibility of 1210 Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates from patients with community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) was carried out over 3 years (1999-2001) in Portugal. Testing of all isolates was undertaken in a central laboratory. Overall macrolide resistance was 13.1%. Decreased susceptibility to penicillin was 24.5% (15.5% low-level and 9.0% high-level resistance). Taken into consideration, the resistance rates reported in a previous surveillance study of 1989-1993, a six-fold increase of erythromycin resistance in the last decade was documented. Resistance to erythromycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin was higher in pediatric patients than in adults. The overwhelming majority (82.3%) of macrolide-resistant isolates were multidrug resistant, although 44.9% were fully susceptible to penicillin. Most macrolide-resistant isolates (80.4%) showed the MLSB phenotype (76.6% MLSB-constitutive resistance, and 3.8% MLSB-inducible resistance) and were also resistant to clindamycin, tetracycline, and co-trimoxazole. The M phenotype was seen in 19.6% isolates and these had MIC90 values of 8 mg/L for erythromycin and clarithromycin, and of 12 mg/L for azithromycin. The clinical significance of macrolide resistance in the management of LRTI is discussed. Because of the specific situation concerning macrolide resistance described in S. pneumoniae, careful use of macrolide antibiotics in therapy and cautious monitoring of macrolide resistance should be continued in Portugal.

Key concepts: Erythromycin, Azithromycin, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Clarithromycin, Ketolide, Macrolide Antibiotics, Penicillin, Microbiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Macrolide Resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolated from Patients with Community-Acquired Lower Respiratory Tract Infections in Portugal: Results of a 3-Year (1999-2001) Multicenter Surveillance Study — Research Paper | ScholarLens