2008Journal of Operations ManagementRequires access

The evolution of the intellectual structure of operations management—1980–2006: A citation/co‐citation analysis

Alan Pilkington, Jack R. Meredith

Open publisher page 536 citations

Abstract

Abstract Citation analysis combined with a network analysis of co‐citation data from three major operations management (OM) journals is used to reveal the evolution of the intellectual structure of the OM field between 1980 and 2006. This spans the entire time since the beginning of research journals specific to the field. Employing a bibliometric citation/co‐citation analysis to investigate the foundations of the discipline enables a robust, quantitative approach to uncovering the evolution of research in OM. The study finds that the intellectual structure of the field made statistically significant changes between the 1980s, the 1990s, and the 2000s and evolved from a pre‐occupation with narrow, tactical topics toward more strategic, macrotopics, including new research methods and techniques. A factor analysis identifies the 12 top knowledge groups in the field and how they change over the decades. Illustrations of the structure of the co‐citations representing the field are generated from a spring‐embedded algorithm that is an improvement over the standard multi‐dimensional scaling (MDS) approach to illustrating the knowledge groups.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Citation analysis combined with a network analysis of co‐citation data from three major operations management (OM) journals is used to reveal the evolution of the intellectual structure of the OM field between 1980 and 2006. This spans the entire time since the beginning of research journals specific to the field. Employing a bibliometric citation/co‐citation analysis to investigate the foundations of the discipline enables a robust, quantitative approach to uncovering the evolution of research in OM. The study finds that the intellectual structure of the field made statistically significant changes between the 1980s, the 1990s, and the 2000s and evolved from a pre‐occupation with narrow, tactical topics toward more strategic, macrotopics, including new research methods and techniques. A factor analysis identifies the 12 top knowledge groups in the field and how they change over the decades. Illustrations of the structure of the co‐citations representing the field are generated from a spring‐embedded algorithm that is an improvement over the standard multi‐dimensional scaling (MDS) approach to illustrating the knowledge groups.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 536 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Citation analysis combined with a network analysis of co‐citation data from three major operations management (OM) journals is used to reveal the evolution of the intellectual structure of the OM field between 1980 and 2006. This spans the entire time since the beginning of research journals specific to the field. Employing a bibliometric citation/co‐citation analysis to investigate the foundations of the discipline enables a robust, quantitative approach to uncovering the evolution of research in OM. The study finds that the intellectual structure of the field made statistically significant changes between the 1980s, the 1990s, and the 2000s and evolved from a pre‐occupation with narrow, tactical topics toward more strategic, macrotopics, including new research methods and techniques. A factor analysis identifies the 12 top knowledge groups in the field and how they change over the decades. Illustrations of the structure of the co‐citations representing the field are generated from a spring‐embedded algorithm that is an improvement over the standard multi‐dimensional scaling (MDS) approach to illustrating the knowledge groups.

Key concepts: Co-citation, Citation, Citation analysis, Field (mathematics), Computer science, Data science, Bibliometrics, Knowledge management

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The evolution of the intellectual structure of operations management—1980–2006: A citation/co‐citation analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens