1986eCommons (Cornell University)Requires access

Formalized Metareasoning in Type Theory

Todd B. Knoblock, Robert L. Constable

Open publisher page 38 citations

Abstract

In this paper we present two practical methods of formalizing the metatheory of constructive type theory and demonstrate how they would be used to improve the reasoning capabilities of formal problem solving systems such as Nuprl. One method depends upon the design of a family of languages, and we sketch that construction. The second approach depends on a particular metatheorem that justifies partial reflection, and we outline this proof. We also illustrate the construction of simple metatheoretic functions, tactics, in Nuprl.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In this paper we present two practical methods of formalizing the metatheory of constructive type theory and demonstrate how they would be used to improve the reasoning capabilities of formal problem solving systems such as Nuprl. One method depends upon the design of a family of languages, and we sketch that construction. The second approach depends on a particular metatheorem that justifies partial reflection, and we outline this proof. We also illustrate the construction of simple metatheoretic functions, tactics, in Nuprl.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 38 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In this paper we present two practical methods of formalizing the metatheory of constructive type theory and demonstrate how they would be used to improve the reasoning capabilities of formal problem solving systems such as Nuprl. One method depends upon the design of a family of languages, and we sketch that construction. The second approach depends on a particular metatheorem that justifies partial reflection, and we outline this proof. We also illustrate the construction of simple metatheoretic functions, tactics, in Nuprl.

Key concepts: Metatheory, Sketch, Type theory, Constructive, Computer science, Reflection (computer programming), Simple (philosophy), Type (biology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Formalized Metareasoning in Type Theory — Research Paper | ScholarLens