Formalized Metareasoning in Type Theory
Todd B. Knoblock, Robert L. Constable
Abstract
Todd B. Knoblock, Robert L. Constable
Abstract
In this paper we present two practical methods of formalizing the metatheory of constructive type theory and demonstrate how they would be used to improve the reasoning capabilities of formal problem solving systems such as Nuprl. One method depends upon the design of a family of languages, and we sketch that construction. The second approach depends on a particular metatheorem that justifies partial reflection, and we outline this proof. We also illustrate the construction of simple metatheoretic functions, tactics, in Nuprl.
OpenAlex reports 38 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In this paper we present two practical methods of formalizing the metatheory of constructive type theory and demonstrate how they would be used to improve the reasoning capabilities of formal problem solving systems such as Nuprl. One method depends upon the design of a family of languages, and we sketch that construction. The second approach depends on a particular metatheorem that justifies partial reflection, and we outline this proof. We also illustrate the construction of simple metatheoretic functions, tactics, in Nuprl.
Key concepts: Metatheory, Sketch, Type theory, Constructive, Computer science, Reflection (computer programming), Simple (philosophy), Type (biology)