2000Urban History ReviewOpen access

After the Sprawl? Suburban Pasts and Futures In the Greater Toronto Area

Michael Buzzelli

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

As students of the city, we concern ourselves in large part with urban form, specifically with the ways that cities are built, the consequences of form for urban residents, and alternatives we have for urban growth. In the exhibit After the Sprawl? Suburban Pasts and Futures in the Greater Toronto Area, curator Michael McMahon presents these issues in the context of suburbanization in the Toronto region after World War Two. Its main message is that suburbanization has continuously bred counter-movements, each meant to solve the problem of sprawl, though never succeeding. Visitors are shown that if sprawl is to be managed, viable past efforts at containment and new alternatives must be put into practice. But as the exhibit title itself suggests, the momentum of Toronto’s city-building practices are too entrenched to deal with sprawl effectively, making alternatives appear hopelessly optimistic.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

As students of the city, we concern ourselves in large part with urban form, specifically with the ways that cities are built, the consequences of form for urban residents, and alternatives we have for urban growth. In the exhibit After the Sprawl? Suburban Pasts and Futures in the Greater Toronto Area, curator Michael McMahon presents these issues in the context of suburbanization in the Toronto region after World War Two. Its main message is that suburbanization has continuously bred counter-movements, each meant to solve the problem of sprawl, though never succeeding. Visitors are shown that if sprawl is to be managed, viable past efforts at containment and new alternatives must be put into practice. But as the exhibit title itself suggests, the momentum of Toronto’s city-building practices are too entrenched to deal with sprawl effectively, making alternatives appear hopelessly optimistic.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

As students of the city, we concern ourselves in large part with urban form, specifically with the ways that cities are built, the consequences of form for urban residents, and alternatives we have for urban growth. In the exhibit After the Sprawl? Suburban Pasts and Futures in the Greater Toronto Area, curator Michael McMahon presents these issues in the context of suburbanization in the Toronto region after World War Two. Its main message is that suburbanization has continuously bred counter-movements, each meant to solve the problem of sprawl, though never succeeding. Visitors are shown that if sprawl is to be managed, viable past efforts at containment and new alternatives must be put into practice. But as the exhibit title itself suggests, the momentum of Toronto’s city-building practices are too entrenched to deal with sprawl effectively, making alternatives appear hopelessly optimistic.

Key concepts: Urban sprawl, Suburbanization, Futures contract, Context (archaeology), Geography, Economic geography, Economic growth, Urban planning

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
After the Sprawl? Suburban Pasts and Futures In the Greater Toronto Area — Research Paper | ScholarLens