Generalized Approach for Assessing Direct User Impacts of Multimodal Transport Projects
Brian Baird Alstadt, Glen Weisbrod
Abstract
Brian Baird Alstadt, Glen Weisbrod
Abstract
The effects of a transportation project can be estimated either by benefit–cost accounting or by economic development impact analysis; both are regularly used by government agencies to plan and justify investments. Although these approaches differ in methodology, both rely on the estimation of direct user impacts—those arising from changes in the quantity and quality of travel. However, a survey of published analyses and guides reveals, first, that there is considerable confusion between an economic benefit (as used in benefit–cost accounting) and an economic impact (as used in impact analysis) and, second, that user impacts are frequently estimated too narrowly by ignoring intermodal effects and impacts to freight shippers. To address these issues, a framework is presented for estimating direct user impacts that is generalized to accommodate multiple travel modes in a way that avoids double counting, gives a full treatment of freight shippers and carriers, and differentiates between benefits and impacts for use in either type of analysis.
OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The effects of a transportation project can be estimated either by benefit–cost accounting or by economic development impact analysis; both are regularly used by government agencies to plan and justify investments. Although these approaches differ in methodology, both rely on the estimation of direct user impacts—those arising from changes in the quantity and quality of travel. However, a survey of published analyses and guides reveals, first, that there is considerable confusion between an economic benefit (as used in benefit–cost accounting) and an economic impact (as used in impact analysis) and, second, that user impacts are frequently estimated too narrowly by ignoring intermodal effects and impacts to freight shippers. To address these issues, a framework is presented for estimating direct user impacts that is generalized to accommodate multiple travel modes in a way that avoids double counting, gives a full treatment of freight shippers and carriers, and differentiates between benefits and impacts for use in either type of analysis.
Key concepts: Economic impact analysis, Government (linguistics), Estimation, Confusion, Cost–benefit analysis, Transport engineering, Quality (philosophy), Plan (archaeology)