2000British Journal Of NutritionOpen access

Use of the retinol-binding protein : transthyretin ratio for assessment of vitamin A status during the acute-phase response

Suzanne Filteau, Juana Willumsen, Keith Sullivan, Karin Simmank, Mary V. Gamble

Open full text 35 citations

Abstract

The ratio plasma retinol-binding protein (RBP):transthyretin (TTR) has been proposed as a means to improve the assessment of vitamin A status of individuals with concurrent infection or inflammation. We have measured RBP and TTR in stored sera from South African children who had accidentally ingested kerosene. Samples were collected from these children in hospital when suffering acute inflammation and respiratory distress, and from them and neighbourhood control children 3 months later. Vitamin A status was defined by modified relative dose response (MRDR) tests of liver retinol stores at 3 months and by serum retinol concentration both when children were ill and when they were well. Illness was defined as either being in hospital or, at follow-up, as having a raised plasma alpha 1-acid glycoprotein (AGP) level. The RBP:TTR value was significantly decreased by both illness and low liver retinol stores. When the effects on RBP:TTR of illness and vitamin A stores were considered together for the 3-month follow-up samples, only vitamin A status significantly decreased the value. We calculated sensitivity and specificity of the RBP:TTR ratio against established measures of vitamin A status using a cut-off value of 0.3 for RBP:TTR and standard cut-off values for MRDR (0.06) and plasma retinol (0.7 mumol/l). Compared with MRDR, RBP:TTR had sensitivities of 76% and 43% and specificities of 22% and 81% to detect vitamin A deficiency in hospitalized and well children respectively. Compared with plasma retinol, sensitivities were 88% and 44% and specificities were 55% and 64% in hospitalized and well children respectively. Only for the case of clinically well children with biochemical evidence of subclinical inflammation did sensitivity (62% and 100% against MRDR and plasma retinol respectively) and specificity (100% and 60% against MRDR and retinol) approach useful levels for an assessment tool. Overall, although a trend supporting the theory behind the use of the RBP:TTR for assessment of vitamin A status in infection was observed in the current study, the ratio did not provide adequate sensitivity and specificity to be a useful assessment tool.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The ratio plasma retinol-binding protein (RBP):transthyretin (TTR) has been proposed as a means to improve the assessment of vitamin A status of individuals with concurrent infection or inflammation. We have measured RBP and TTR in stored sera from South African children who had accidentally ingested kerosene. Samples were collected from these children in hospital when suffering acute inflammation and respiratory distress, and from them and neighbourhood control children 3 months later. Vitamin A status was defined by modified relative dose response (MRDR) tests of liver retinol stores at 3 months and by serum retinol concentration both when children were ill and when they were well. Illness was defined as either being in hospital or, at follow-up, as having a raised plasma alpha 1-acid glycoprotein (AGP) level. The RBP:TTR value was significantly decreased by both illness and low liver retinol stores. When the effects on RBP:TTR of illness and vitamin A stores were considered together for the 3-month follow-up samples, only vitamin A status significantly decreased the value. We calculated sensitivity and specificity of the RBP:TTR ratio against established measures of vitamin A status using a cut-off value of 0.3 for RBP:TTR and standard cut-off values for MRDR (0.06) and plasma retinol (0.7 mumol/l). Compared with MRDR, RBP:TTR had sensitivities of 76% and 43% and specificities of 22% and 81% to detect vitamin A deficiency in hospitalized and well children respectively. Compared with plasma retinol, sensitivities were 88% and 44% and specificities were 55% and 64% in hospitalized and well children respectively. Only for the case of clinically well children with biochemical evidence of subclinical inflammation did sensitivity (62% and 100% against MRDR and plasma retinol respectively) and specificity (100% and 60% against MRDR and retinol) approach useful levels for an assessment tool. Overall, although a trend supporting the theory behind the use of the RBP:TTR for assessment of vitamin A status in infection was observed in the current study, the ratio did not provide adequate sensitivity and specificity to be a useful assessment tool.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 35 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The ratio plasma retinol-binding protein (RBP):transthyretin (TTR) has been proposed as a means to improve the assessment of vitamin A status of individuals with concurrent infection or inflammation. We have measured RBP and TTR in stored sera from South African children who had accidentally ingested kerosene. Samples were collected from these children in hospital when suffering acute inflammation and respiratory distress, and from them and neighbourhood control children 3 months later. Vitamin A status was defined by modified relative dose response (MRDR) tests of liver retinol stores at 3 months and by serum retinol concentration both when children were ill and when they were well. Illness was defined as either being in hospital or, at follow-up, as having a raised plasma alpha 1-acid glycoprotein (AGP) level. The RBP:TTR value was significantly decreased by both illness and low liver retinol stores. When the effects on RBP:TTR of illness and vitamin A stores were considered together for the 3-month follow-up samples, only vitamin A status significantly decreased the value. We calculated sensitivity and specificity of the RBP:TTR ratio against established measures of vitamin A status using a cut-off value of 0.3 for RBP:TTR and standard cut-off values for MRDR (0.06) and plasma retinol (0.7 mumol/l). Compared with MRDR, RBP:TTR had sensitivities of 76% and 43% and specificities of 22% and 81% to detect vitamin A deficiency in hospitalized and well children respectively. Compared with plasma retinol, sensitivities were 88% and 44% and specificities were 55% and 64% in hospitalized and well children respectively. Only for the case of clinically well children with biochemical evidence of subclinical inflammation did sensitivity (62% and 100% against MRDR and plasma retinol respectively) and specificity (100% and 60% against MRDR and retinol) approach useful levels for an assessment tool. Overall, although a trend supporting the theory behind the use of the RBP:TTR for assessment of vitamin A status in infection was observed in the current study, the ratio did not provide adequate sensitivity and specificity to be a useful assessment tool.

Key concepts: Transthyretin, Retinol, Retinol binding protein, Vitamin, Internal medicine, Acute-phase protein, Vitamin A deficiency, Endocrinology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Use of the retinol-binding protein : transthyretin ratio for assessment of vitamin A status during the acute-phase response — Research Paper | ScholarLens