1985PubMedRequires access

Heparin monitoring during cardiopulmonary bypass.

Arsalan Saleem, SS Shenaq, DH Yawn, K Harshberger, Pierre Diemunsch, P Mohindra

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

Three procedures have been compared for monitoring heparin in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass: (1) activated clotting time (ACT) (2) protamine titration, and (3) fluorometric substrate assay. The ACT monitors the degree of anticoagulation. It is easy to perform and is relatively inexpensive, however, it does not correlate well with heparin levels and may not accurately predict the protamine dose for neutralization of heparin at the completion of bypass. A protamine titration assay or an assay using a thrombin-sensitive fluorometric substrate measures the heparin level and calculates the protamine requirement at the completion of surgery; however, these assays do not indicate the degree of anticoagulation. The fluorometric assay is the less expensive of the two assay measuring heparin, but it requires an experienced technologist to perform the test.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Three procedures have been compared for monitoring heparin in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass: (1) activated clotting time (ACT) (2) protamine titration, and (3) fluorometric substrate assay. The ACT monitors the degree of anticoagulation. It is easy to perform and is relatively inexpensive, however, it does not correlate well with heparin levels and may not accurately predict the protamine dose for neutralization of heparin at the completion of bypass. A protamine titration assay or an assay using a thrombin-sensitive fluorometric substrate measures the heparin level and calculates the protamine requirement at the completion of surgery; however, these assays do not indicate the degree of anticoagulation. The fluorometric assay is the less expensive of the two assay measuring heparin, but it requires an experienced technologist to perform the test.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Three procedures have been compared for monitoring heparin in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass: (1) activated clotting time (ACT) (2) protamine titration, and (3) fluorometric substrate assay. The ACT monitors the degree of anticoagulation. It is easy to perform and is relatively inexpensive, however, it does not correlate well with heparin levels and may not accurately predict the protamine dose for neutralization of heparin at the completion of bypass. A protamine titration assay or an assay using a thrombin-sensitive fluorometric substrate measures the heparin level and calculates the protamine requirement at the completion of surgery; however, these assays do not indicate the degree of anticoagulation. The fluorometric assay is the less expensive of the two assay measuring heparin, but it requires an experienced technologist to perform the test.

Key concepts: Protamine, Heparin, Cardiopulmonary bypass, Activated clotting time, Titration, Substrate (aquarium), Medicine, Protamine sulfate

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Heparin monitoring during cardiopulmonary bypass. — Research Paper | ScholarLens