1992Archives of General PsychiatryRequires access

Cognitive Therapy and Pharmacotherapy for Depression

Steven D. Hollon

Open publisher page 485 citations

Abstract

Cognitive therapy and imipramine hydrochloride tricyclic pharmacotherapy, each singly and in combination, were compared in the treatment of nonpsychotic, nonbipolar depressed outpatients. One hundred seven patients were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of active treatment; 64 patients completed the full course of treatment. Rates of attrition were high but not differential. Cognitive therapy and pharmacotherapy did not differ in terms of symptomatic response, either in the primary analyses or in secondary analyses restricted to more severely depressed outpatients. Initial severity did predict response within pharmacotherapy alone, but not within cognitive therapy. Combining cognitive therapy with pharmacotherapy did not markedly improve response over that observed for either modality alone, although such nonsignificant differences as were evident did favor the combined treatment. Two patients died as a consequence of suicide attempts, both of which involved study medication.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Cognitive therapy and imipramine hydrochloride tricyclic pharmacotherapy, each singly and in combination, were compared in the treatment of nonpsychotic, nonbipolar depressed outpatients. One hundred seven patients were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of active treatment; 64 patients completed the full course of treatment. Rates of attrition were high but not differential. Cognitive therapy and pharmacotherapy did not differ in terms of symptomatic response, either in the primary analyses or in secondary analyses restricted to more severely depressed outpatients. Initial severity did predict response within pharmacotherapy alone, but not within cognitive therapy. Combining cognitive therapy with pharmacotherapy did not markedly improve response over that observed for either modality alone, although such nonsignificant differences as were evident did favor the combined treatment. Two patients died as a consequence of suicide attempts, both of which involved study medication.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 485 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Cognitive therapy and imipramine hydrochloride tricyclic pharmacotherapy, each singly and in combination, were compared in the treatment of nonpsychotic, nonbipolar depressed outpatients. One hundred seven patients were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of active treatment; 64 patients completed the full course of treatment. Rates of attrition were high but not differential. Cognitive therapy and pharmacotherapy did not differ in terms of symptomatic response, either in the primary analyses or in secondary analyses restricted to more severely depressed outpatients. Initial severity did predict response within pharmacotherapy alone, but not within cognitive therapy. Combining cognitive therapy with pharmacotherapy did not markedly improve response over that observed for either modality alone, although such nonsignificant differences as were evident did favor the combined treatment. Two patients died as a consequence of suicide attempts, both of which involved study medication.

Key concepts: Pharmacotherapy, Depression (economics), Cognitive therapy, Imipramine, Cognition, Medicine, Psychiatry, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cognitive Therapy and Pharmacotherapy for Depression — Research Paper | ScholarLens