A curriculum development case study in biology: two levels of interpretation
Miriam Ben‐Peretz, Moshe Silberstein
Abstract
Miriam Ben‐Peretz, Moshe Silberstein
Abstract
Summaries English In this article, the authors examine the nature of curricular decision‐making at two levels which relate, respectively, to external curriculum developers and to teachers as curriculum users. At the first level, the process of translating scholarly, scientific material into formal curriculum materials is influenced by the curriculum developers’ interpretation of curricular constraints and intentions. At the second level, the adoption or adaptation of curricular materials in classroom teaching is influenced by the teachers’ perception and interpretation of the curriculum materials. As a study of an Israeli curriculum unit has revealed, there are significant differences between curriculum developers on the one hand, and curriculum users on the other, in their interpretation of curricular constraints, intentions and implementation possibilities.
OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Summaries English In this article, the authors examine the nature of curricular decision‐making at two levels which relate, respectively, to external curriculum developers and to teachers as curriculum users. At the first level, the process of translating scholarly, scientific material into formal curriculum materials is influenced by the curriculum developers’ interpretation of curricular constraints and intentions. At the second level, the adoption or adaptation of curricular materials in classroom teaching is influenced by the teachers’ perception and interpretation of the curriculum materials. As a study of an Israeli curriculum unit has revealed, there are significant differences between curriculum developers on the one hand, and curriculum users on the other, in their interpretation of curricular constraints, intentions and implementation possibilities.
Key concepts: Curriculum, Interpretation (philosophy), Curriculum theory, Emergent curriculum, Adaptation (eye), Mathematics education, Curriculum mapping, Perception