1982•European Journal of Science EducationRequires access

A curriculum development case study in biology: two levels of interpretation

Miriam Ben‐Peretz, Moshe Silberstein

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

Summaries English In this article, the authors examine the nature of curricular decision‐making at two levels which relate, respectively, to external curriculum developers and to teachers as curriculum users. At the first level, the process of translating scholarly, scientific material into formal curriculum materials is influenced by the curriculum developers’ interpretation of curricular constraints and intentions. At the second level, the adoption or adaptation of curricular materials in classroom teaching is influenced by the teachers’ perception and interpretation of the curriculum materials. As a study of an Israeli curriculum unit has revealed, there are significant differences between curriculum developers on the one hand, and curriculum users on the other, in their interpretation of curricular constraints, intentions and implementation possibilities.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Summaries English In this article, the authors examine the nature of curricular decision‐making at two levels which relate, respectively, to external curriculum developers and to teachers as curriculum users. At the first level, the process of translating scholarly, scientific material into formal curriculum materials is influenced by the curriculum developers’ interpretation of curricular constraints and intentions. At the second level, the adoption or adaptation of curricular materials in classroom teaching is influenced by the teachers’ perception and interpretation of the curriculum materials. As a study of an Israeli curriculum unit has revealed, there are significant differences between curriculum developers on the one hand, and curriculum users on the other, in their interpretation of curricular constraints, intentions and implementation possibilities.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Summaries English In this article, the authors examine the nature of curricular decision‐making at two levels which relate, respectively, to external curriculum developers and to teachers as curriculum users. At the first level, the process of translating scholarly, scientific material into formal curriculum materials is influenced by the curriculum developers’ interpretation of curricular constraints and intentions. At the second level, the adoption or adaptation of curricular materials in classroom teaching is influenced by the teachers’ perception and interpretation of the curriculum materials. As a study of an Israeli curriculum unit has revealed, there are significant differences between curriculum developers on the one hand, and curriculum users on the other, in their interpretation of curricular constraints, intentions and implementation possibilities.

Key concepts: Curriculum, Interpretation (philosophy), Curriculum theory, Emergent curriculum, Adaptation (eye), Mathematics education, Curriculum mapping, Perception

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A curriculum development case study in biology: two levels of interpretation — Research Paper | ScholarLens