1997Competitive Intelligence ReviewRequires access

Criminal consequences of trade secret theft: The EEA and compliance plans

James H. A. Pooley

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

For trade secret owners, the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 (the EEA) provides the prospect of greatly improved protection of property rights. For company employees, the EEA means more attention to defending proprietary information. For competitive intelligence gatherers—including outside consulting firms—the EEA brings new legal restrictions backed up by criminal penalties. Under the government's Federal Sentencing Guidelines, prosecutions for trade secret theft are less likely to be brought if the victim company can show it took steps to prevent and detect criminal conduct. Businesses should therefore adopt and implement compliance plans to protect their proprietary trade secrets. These plans should be designed to take account of the specific risks a company faces. Records should be maintained to demonstrate that the company took all reasonable steps to observe activity that might indicate a misappropriation of trade secrets. Ultimate responsibility for defining and enforcing compliance plans should lie with high-level personnel with authority to influence compliance in a meaningful way. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

For trade secret owners, the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 (the EEA) provides the prospect of greatly improved protection of property rights. For company employees, the EEA means more attention to defending proprietary information. For competitive intelligence gatherers—including outside consulting firms—the EEA brings new legal restrictions backed up by criminal penalties. Under the government's Federal Sentencing Guidelines, prosecutions for trade secret theft are less likely to be brought if the victim company can show it took steps to prevent and detect criminal conduct. Businesses should therefore adopt and implement compliance plans to protect their proprietary trade secrets. These plans should be designed to take account of the specific risks a company faces. Records should be maintained to demonstrate that the company took all reasonable steps to observe activity that might indicate a misappropriation of trade secrets. Ultimate responsibility for defining and enforcing compliance plans should lie with high-level personnel with authority to influence compliance in a meaningful way. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

For trade secret owners, the Economic Espionage Act of 1996 (the EEA) provides the prospect of greatly improved protection of property rights. For company employees, the EEA means more attention to defending proprietary information. For competitive intelligence gatherers—including outside consulting firms—the EEA brings new legal restrictions backed up by criminal penalties. Under the government's Federal Sentencing Guidelines, prosecutions for trade secret theft are less likely to be brought if the victim company can show it took steps to prevent and detect criminal conduct. Businesses should therefore adopt and implement compliance plans to protect their proprietary trade secrets. These plans should be designed to take account of the specific risks a company faces. Records should be maintained to demonstrate that the company took all reasonable steps to observe activity that might indicate a misappropriation of trade secrets. Ultimate responsibility for defining and enforcing compliance plans should lie with high-level personnel with authority to influence compliance in a meaningful way. © 1997 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Key concepts: Misappropriation, Trade secret, Industrial espionage, Compliance (psychology), Business, Government (linguistics), Espionage, Intellectual property

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Criminal consequences of trade secret theft: The EEA and compliance plans — Research Paper | ScholarLens