1997Journal of Antimicrobial ChemotherapyOpen access

Comparison of disc diffusion and agar dilution methods for antibiotic susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni subsp. jejuni and Campylobacter coli

Christiane Gaudreau, Huguette Gilbert

Open full text 109 citations

Abstract

The correlation between disc diffusion and agar dilution susceptibility testing of five antibiotics was studied against 145 Campylobacter strains: 99 Campylobacter jejuni subsp. jejuni and 46 Campylobacter coli. The percentages of true results and 95% CI for disc diffusion for resistant strains were 100% (93.2-100%) for tetracycline (53 strains tested), 100% (77.2-100%) for ciprofloxacin (13 strains tested), 86.7% (62.1-96.3%) for nalidixic acid (15 strains tested), 100% (56.6-100%) for erythromycin (five strains tested) and 68.8% (44.4-85.8%) for ampicillin (16 strains tested). The percentages of true results and 95% CI were 97.6-100% and 93.2-100% respectively for 89-140 susceptible strains to the five antibiotics tested. There was a 1.4% major error for nalidixic acid, 0.7% very major error for erythromycin, 5.5% and 1.4% minor and major errors respectively for ampicillin. There was complete agreement for ciprofloxacin and tetracycline. Results of ampicillin susceptibility are not expected to be useful in a clinical setting. The nalidixic acid disc is a marker of ciprofloxacin susceptibility as the nalidixic acid-susceptible strains were susceptible to ciprofloxacin while most of the resistant ones were resistant to ciprofloxacin. Overall, our results suggest that disc diffusion is a reliable, easy and inexpensive susceptibility testing method for C. jejuni and C. coli for erythromycin, ciprofloxacin and tetracycline. Until more erythromycin- and ciprofloxacin-resistant strains are tested to confirm the reliability of this test, the resistance to these drugs needs to be confirmed using the Etest or the agar dilution method.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The correlation between disc diffusion and agar dilution susceptibility testing of five antibiotics was studied against 145 Campylobacter strains: 99 Campylobacter jejuni subsp. jejuni and 46 Campylobacter coli. The percentages of true results and 95% CI for disc diffusion for resistant strains were 100% (93.2-100%) for tetracycline (53 strains tested), 100% (77.2-100%) for ciprofloxacin (13 strains tested), 86.7% (62.1-96.3%) for nalidixic acid (15 strains tested), 100% (56.6-100%) for erythromycin (five strains tested) and 68.8% (44.4-85.8%) for ampicillin (16 strains tested). The percentages of true results and 95% CI were 97.6-100% and 93.2-100% respectively for 89-140 susceptible strains to the five antibiotics tested. There was a 1.4% major error for nalidixic acid, 0.7% very major error for erythromycin, 5.5% and 1.4% minor and major errors respectively for ampicillin. There was complete agreement for ciprofloxacin and tetracycline. Results of ampicillin susceptibility are not expected to be useful in a clinical setting. The nalidixic acid disc is a marker of ciprofloxacin susceptibility as the nalidixic acid-susceptible strains were susceptible to ciprofloxacin while most of the resistant ones were resistant to ciprofloxacin. Overall, our results suggest that disc diffusion is a reliable, easy and inexpensive susceptibility testing method for C. jejuni and C. coli for erythromycin, ciprofloxacin and tetracycline. Until more erythromycin- and ciprofloxacin-resistant strains are tested to confirm the reliability of this test, the resistance to these drugs needs to be confirmed using the Etest or the agar dilution method.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 109 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The correlation between disc diffusion and agar dilution susceptibility testing of five antibiotics was studied against 145 Campylobacter strains: 99 Campylobacter jejuni subsp. jejuni and 46 Campylobacter coli. The percentages of true results and 95% CI for disc diffusion for resistant strains were 100% (93.2-100%) for tetracycline (53 strains tested), 100% (77.2-100%) for ciprofloxacin (13 strains tested), 86.7% (62.1-96.3%) for nalidixic acid (15 strains tested), 100% (56.6-100%) for erythromycin (five strains tested) and 68.8% (44.4-85.8%) for ampicillin (16 strains tested). The percentages of true results and 95% CI were 97.6-100% and 93.2-100% respectively for 89-140 susceptible strains to the five antibiotics tested. There was a 1.4% major error for nalidixic acid, 0.7% very major error for erythromycin, 5.5% and 1.4% minor and major errors respectively for ampicillin. There was complete agreement for ciprofloxacin and tetracycline. Results of ampicillin susceptibility are not expected to be useful in a clinical setting. The nalidixic acid disc is a marker of ciprofloxacin susceptibility as the nalidixic acid-susceptible strains were susceptible to ciprofloxacin while most of the resistant ones were resistant to ciprofloxacin. Overall, our results suggest that disc diffusion is a reliable, easy and inexpensive susceptibility testing method for C. jejuni and C. coli for erythromycin, ciprofloxacin and tetracycline. Until more erythromycin- and ciprofloxacin-resistant strains are tested to confirm the reliability of this test, the resistance to these drugs needs to be confirmed using the Etest or the agar dilution method.

Key concepts: Nalidixic acid, Campylobacter jejuni, Ciprofloxacin, Microbiology, Tetracycline, Campylobacter, Agar dilution, Ampicillin

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of disc diffusion and agar dilution methods for antibiotic susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni subsp. jejuni and Campylobacter coli — Research Paper | ScholarLens