1981PubMedOpen access

Dynamics of Concomitant Populations of Hoplolaimus columbus, Scutellonema brachyurum, and Meloidogyne incognita on Cotton.

Helmuth Kraus-Schmidt, Stephen A. Lewis

Open full text 16 citations

Abstract

Cotton seedlings grown in a greenhouse and a growth chamber were inoculated with Scutellonema brachyurum, Hoplolaimus columbus, and Meloidogyne incognita, singly and in all possible combinations, at two initial population (Pi) levels (100 and 300/100 cm(3)). S. brachyurum alone was not pathogenic to cotton at these population levels. It fed primarily as an ectoparasite but matured and reproduced within the root when it penetrated. Populations of S. brachyurum increased in the presence of H. columbus but were suppressed by M. incognita. H. columbus suppressed dry shoot weights of cotton (P = 0.05) at a Pi of 300/100 cm(3) soil. Simultaneous inoculation of H. columbus with either M. incognita or S. brachyurum increased H. columbus populations over treatments with H. columbus alone, both at 60 and 90 d after inoculation. M. incognita suppressed cotton shoot weights significantly (P = 0.05) at both Pi levels. Inoculation with S. brachyurum increased M. incognita populations 60 d after inoculation, while H. columbus suppressed populations of M. incognita. Most larvae of M. incognita did not develop to maturity in the presence of H. columbus. Giant cells aborted and were necrotic 20-25 d after inoculation. Since M. incognita and H. columbus feed on different tissues, the inhibition of M. incognita may have resulted from a physiological effect of H. columbus on the host.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Cotton seedlings grown in a greenhouse and a growth chamber were inoculated with Scutellonema brachyurum, Hoplolaimus columbus, and Meloidogyne incognita, singly and in all possible combinations, at two initial population (Pi) levels (100 and 300/100 cm(3)). S. brachyurum alone was not pathogenic to cotton at these population levels. It fed primarily as an ectoparasite but matured and reproduced within the root when it penetrated. Populations of S. brachyurum increased in the presence of H. columbus but were suppressed by M. incognita. H. columbus suppressed dry shoot weights of cotton (P = 0.05) at a Pi of 300/100 cm(3) soil. Simultaneous inoculation of H. columbus with either M. incognita or S. brachyurum increased H. columbus populations over treatments with H. columbus alone, both at 60 and 90 d after inoculation. M. incognita suppressed cotton shoot weights significantly (P = 0.05) at both Pi levels. Inoculation with S. brachyurum increased M. incognita populations 60 d after inoculation, while H. columbus suppressed populations of M. incognita. Most larvae of M. incognita did not develop to maturity in the presence of H. columbus. Giant cells aborted and were necrotic 20-25 d after inoculation. Since M. incognita and H. columbus feed on different tissues, the inhibition of M. incognita may have resulted from a physiological effect of H. columbus on the host.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Cotton seedlings grown in a greenhouse and a growth chamber were inoculated with Scutellonema brachyurum, Hoplolaimus columbus, and Meloidogyne incognita, singly and in all possible combinations, at two initial population (Pi) levels (100 and 300/100 cm(3)). S. brachyurum alone was not pathogenic to cotton at these population levels. It fed primarily as an ectoparasite but matured and reproduced within the root when it penetrated. Populations of S. brachyurum increased in the presence of H. columbus but were suppressed by M. incognita. H. columbus suppressed dry shoot weights of cotton (P = 0.05) at a Pi of 300/100 cm(3) soil. Simultaneous inoculation of H. columbus with either M. incognita or S. brachyurum increased H. columbus populations over treatments with H. columbus alone, both at 60 and 90 d after inoculation. M. incognita suppressed cotton shoot weights significantly (P = 0.05) at both Pi levels. Inoculation with S. brachyurum increased M. incognita populations 60 d after inoculation, while H. columbus suppressed populations of M. incognita. Most larvae of M. incognita did not develop to maturity in the presence of H. columbus. Giant cells aborted and were necrotic 20-25 d after inoculation. Since M. incognita and H. columbus feed on different tissues, the inhibition of M. incognita may have resulted from a physiological effect of H. columbus on the host.

Key concepts: Meloidogyne incognita, Terra incognita, Inoculation, Biology, Population, Horticulture, Shoot, Nematode

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Dynamics of Concomitant Populations of Hoplolaimus columbus, Scutellonema brachyurum, and Meloidogyne incognita on Cotton. — Research Paper | ScholarLens