1977Unpublished venueRequires access

Predicting Attrition: A Test of Alternative Approaches

Robert F. Lockman, John T. Warner

Open publisher page 32 citations

Abstract

The history of predicting premature attrition, that is, losses before the completion of the first-term of military service, dates back at least to the early 1960s. At that time, researchers in the Navy, Army, and Air Force found that the best pre-service predictors of premature attrition were, in order, level of education, mental ability, and age. The multiple correlation of these three predictors with various measures of attrition was about .35 for all three services. In-service measures of performance and ratings of behavior increased the predictability of attrition, but they could not be used for screening out potential recruits who were high loss risks. Personality tests have also been related to premature attrition with varying degrees of success, but they must be specially administered to applicants if they are to be used for screening purposes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The history of predicting premature attrition, that is, losses before the completion of the first-term of military service, dates back at least to the early 1960s. At that time, researchers in the Navy, Army, and Air Force found that the best pre-service predictors of premature attrition were, in order, level of education, mental ability, and age. The multiple correlation of these three predictors with various measures of attrition was about .35 for all three services. In-service measures of performance and ratings of behavior increased the predictability of attrition, but they could not be used for screening out potential recruits who were high loss risks. Personality tests have also been related to premature attrition with varying degrees of success, but they must be specially administered to applicants if they are to be used for screening purposes.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 32 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The history of predicting premature attrition, that is, losses before the completion of the first-term of military service, dates back at least to the early 1960s. At that time, researchers in the Navy, Army, and Air Force found that the best pre-service predictors of premature attrition were, in order, level of education, mental ability, and age. The multiple correlation of these three predictors with various measures of attrition was about .35 for all three services. In-service measures of performance and ratings of behavior increased the predictability of attrition, but they could not be used for screening out potential recruits who were high loss risks. Personality tests have also been related to premature attrition with varying degrees of success, but they must be specially administered to applicants if they are to be used for screening purposes.

Key concepts: Attrition, Test (biology), Computer science, Econometrics, Statistics, Mathematics, Geology, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Predicting Attrition: A Test of Alternative Approaches — Research Paper | ScholarLens