1991•Unpublished venueRequires access

GUIDELINES FOR RAILROAD PREEMPTION AT SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS

Peter S. Marshall, William D. Berg

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Preemption of traffic signal controllers near railroad grade crossings equipped with active warning devices is often required because queues from the intersection can extend back over the tracks, thereby creating the potential for a serious vehicle-train accident. This paper reports on the findings of a research study recently completed at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. The objective of the study was to develop methods for determining when preemption is required at isolated intersections, and for specifying the duration of the preemption intervals. Macroscopic traffic flow models and probability theory were used to describe the behavior of traffic under preemption conditions. Human factor considerations pertinent to the driving task were adapted from criteria currently used in establishing intersection sight distance and passing sight distance requirements. Limited resources precluded implementation and field evaluation of the developed methodologies.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Preemption of traffic signal controllers near railroad grade crossings equipped with active warning devices is often required because queues from the intersection can extend back over the tracks, thereby creating the potential for a serious vehicle-train accident. This paper reports on the findings of a research study recently completed at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. The objective of the study was to develop methods for determining when preemption is required at isolated intersections, and for specifying the duration of the preemption intervals. Macroscopic traffic flow models and probability theory were used to describe the behavior of traffic under preemption conditions. Human factor considerations pertinent to the driving task were adapted from criteria currently used in establishing intersection sight distance and passing sight distance requirements. Limited resources precluded implementation and field evaluation of the developed methodologies.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Preemption of traffic signal controllers near railroad grade crossings equipped with active warning devices is often required because queues from the intersection can extend back over the tracks, thereby creating the potential for a serious vehicle-train accident. This paper reports on the findings of a research study recently completed at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. The objective of the study was to develop methods for determining when preemption is required at isolated intersections, and for specifying the duration of the preemption intervals. Macroscopic traffic flow models and probability theory were used to describe the behavior of traffic under preemption conditions. Human factor considerations pertinent to the driving task were adapted from criteria currently used in establishing intersection sight distance and passing sight distance requirements. Limited resources precluded implementation and field evaluation of the developed methodologies.

Key concepts: Preemption, Intersection (aeronautics), Queue, Transport engineering, Computer science, Task (project management), Traffic flow (computer networking), Signal timing

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
GUIDELINES FOR RAILROAD PREEMPTION AT SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS — Research Paper | ScholarLens