2000•Journal of Clinical PsychologyRequires access

The memory assessment scales and lateralized temporal lobe epilepsy

David W. Loring, Bruce P. Hermann, Gregory P. Lee, Daniel L. Drane, Kimford J. Meador

Open publisher page 33 citations

Abstract

We report Memory Assessment Scales (MAS) performance in 101 patients with unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE; left, n = 51; right, n = 50) with left cerebral language dominance. A significant multivariate group effect was present for the major summary indices (Verbal Memory, Visual Memory, and Global Memory, p < .04). Univariate analyses revealed no significant differences for either the Global Memory or Verbal Memory summary scores, although a significant group difference was present for Visual Memory (p < .04). The Verbal Memory-Visual Memory discrepancy score was significantly different between right and left TLE groups (p < .004). Verbal Memory scores were at least 14 points lower than Visual Memory scores in 34 patients (left = 20, 59%; right = 14, 41%). Visual Memory scores were at least 14 points lower than Verbal Memory performance in 20 patients (left = 5, 25%; right = 15, 75%). Diagnostic efficiency statistics show higher sensitivity but lower specificity in group classification for left TLE patients. These data suggest that the MAS is sensitive to material-specific memory deficits associated with a unilateral temporal lobe seizure focus. However, over one-third of the patients (19/54) with at least a 14-point Verbal Memory-Visual Memory discrepancy were classified incorrectly. The MAS, like other material-specific memory measures, should be interpreted within the context of other clinical findings.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We report Memory Assessment Scales (MAS) performance in 101 patients with unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE; left, n = 51; right, n = 50) with left cerebral language dominance. A significant multivariate group effect was present for the major summary indices (Verbal Memory, Visual Memory, and Global Memory, p < .04). Univariate analyses revealed no significant differences for either the Global Memory or Verbal Memory summary scores, although a significant group difference was present for Visual Memory (p < .04). The Verbal Memory-Visual Memory discrepancy score was significantly different between right and left TLE groups (p < .004). Verbal Memory scores were at least 14 points lower than Visual Memory scores in 34 patients (left = 20, 59%; right = 14, 41%). Visual Memory scores were at least 14 points lower than Verbal Memory performance in 20 patients (left = 5, 25%; right = 15, 75%). Diagnostic efficiency statistics show higher sensitivity but lower specificity in group classification for left TLE patients. These data suggest that the MAS is sensitive to material-specific memory deficits associated with a unilateral temporal lobe seizure focus. However, over one-third of the patients (19/54) with at least a 14-point Verbal Memory-Visual Memory discrepancy were classified incorrectly. The MAS, like other material-specific memory measures, should be interpreted within the context of other clinical findings.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 33 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We report Memory Assessment Scales (MAS) performance in 101 patients with unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE; left, n = 51; right, n = 50) with left cerebral language dominance. A significant multivariate group effect was present for the major summary indices (Verbal Memory, Visual Memory, and Global Memory, p < .04). Univariate analyses revealed no significant differences for either the Global Memory or Verbal Memory summary scores, although a significant group difference was present for Visual Memory (p < .04). The Verbal Memory-Visual Memory discrepancy score was significantly different between right and left TLE groups (p < .004). Verbal Memory scores were at least 14 points lower than Visual Memory scores in 34 patients (left = 20, 59%; right = 14, 41%). Visual Memory scores were at least 14 points lower than Verbal Memory performance in 20 patients (left = 5, 25%; right = 15, 75%). Diagnostic efficiency statistics show higher sensitivity but lower specificity in group classification for left TLE patients. These data suggest that the MAS is sensitive to material-specific memory deficits associated with a unilateral temporal lobe seizure focus. However, over one-third of the patients (19/54) with at least a 14-point Verbal Memory-Visual Memory discrepancy were classified incorrectly. The MAS, like other material-specific memory measures, should be interpreted within the context of other clinical findings.

Key concepts: Verbal memory, Psychology, Visual memory, Temporal lobe, Audiology, Context (archaeology), Cognitive psychology, Epilepsy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The memory assessment scales and lateralized temporal lobe epilepsy — Research Paper | ScholarLens