ScholarLens Back to search
2010•Unpublished venueRequires access

Design pattern implementation in object teams

João L. Gomes, Miguel P. Monteiro

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

Implementing the 23 Gang-of-Four design patterns in the aspect-oriented programming language Object Teams/Java (OT/J) yields modularity and reusability results roughly comparable to those obtained in a similar study of AspectJ, though not in the same exact set of patterns. Due to differences in composition mechanisms, the two languages seem complementary rather than overlapping. AspectJ is clearly superior to OT/J in terms of quantification capability while OT/J is clearly superior to AspectJ as regards extensibility of pattern modules.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Implementing the 23 Gang-of-Four design patterns in the aspect-oriented programming language Object Teams/Java (OT/J) yields modularity and reusability results roughly comparable to those obtained in a similar study of AspectJ, though not in the same exact set of patterns. Due to differences in composition mechanisms, the two languages seem complementary rather than overlapping. AspectJ is clearly superior to OT/J in terms of quantification capability while OT/J is clearly superior to AspectJ as regards extensibility of pattern modules.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Implementing the 23 Gang-of-Four design patterns in the aspect-oriented programming language Object Teams/Java (OT/J) yields modularity and reusability results roughly comparable to those obtained in a similar study of AspectJ, though not in the same exact set of patterns. Due to differences in composition mechanisms, the two languages seem complementary rather than overlapping. AspectJ is clearly superior to OT/J in terms of quantification capability while OT/J is clearly superior to AspectJ as regards extensibility of pattern modules.

Key concepts: AspectJ, Aspect-oriented programming, Programming language, Computer science, Modularity (biology), Reusability, Java, Object-oriented programming

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Design pattern implementation in object teams — Research Paper | ScholarLens