1990•Applied Psychological MeasurementOpen access

Bias and the Effect of Priors in Bayesian Estimation of Parameters of Item Response Models

Janice A. Gifford, Hariharan Swaminathan

Open full text 38 citations

Abstract

The effectiveness of a Bayesian approach to the es timation problem in item response models has been sufficiently documented in recent years. Although re search has indicated that Bayesian estimates, in gen eral, are more accurate than joint maximum likelihood (JML) estimates, the effect of choice of priors on the Bayesian estimates is not well known. Moreover, the extent to which the Bayesian estimates are biased in comparison with JML estimates is not known. The ef fect of priors and the amount of bias in Bayesian esti mates is examined in this paper through simulation studies. It is shown that different specifications of prior information have relatively modest effects on the Bayesian estimates. For small samples, it is shown that the Bayesian estimates are less biased than their JML counterparts. Index terms: accuracy, Bayesian estimates, bias, item response models, joint maximum likelihood estimates, priors.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The effectiveness of a Bayesian approach to the es timation problem in item response models has been sufficiently documented in recent years. Although re search has indicated that Bayesian estimates, in gen eral, are more accurate than joint maximum likelihood (JML) estimates, the effect of choice of priors on the Bayesian estimates is not well known. Moreover, the extent to which the Bayesian estimates are biased in comparison with JML estimates is not known. The ef fect of priors and the amount of bias in Bayesian esti mates is examined in this paper through simulation studies. It is shown that different specifications of prior information have relatively modest effects on the Bayesian estimates. For small samples, it is shown that the Bayesian estimates are less biased than their JML counterparts. Index terms: accuracy, Bayesian estimates, bias, item response models, joint maximum likelihood estimates, priors.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 38 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The effectiveness of a Bayesian approach to the es timation problem in item response models has been sufficiently documented in recent years. Although re search has indicated that Bayesian estimates, in gen eral, are more accurate than joint maximum likelihood (JML) estimates, the effect of choice of priors on the Bayesian estimates is not well known. Moreover, the extent to which the Bayesian estimates are biased in comparison with JML estimates is not known. The ef fect of priors and the amount of bias in Bayesian esti mates is examined in this paper through simulation studies. It is shown that different specifications of prior information have relatively modest effects on the Bayesian estimates. For small samples, it is shown that the Bayesian estimates are less biased than their JML counterparts. Index terms: accuracy, Bayesian estimates, bias, item response models, joint maximum likelihood estimates, priors.

Key concepts: Prior probability, Bayesian probability, Bayesian average, Bayes estimator, Statistics, Econometrics, Marginal likelihood, Bayesian statistics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Bias and the Effect of Priors in Bayesian Estimation of Parameters of Item Response Models — Research Paper | ScholarLens