1982Limnology and OceanographyRequires access

Phosphorus release by submerged macrophytes: Significance to epiphyton and phytoplankton1,1

Richard Carignan, J. Kalff

Open publisher page 144 citations

Abstract

The contribution of nine species of macrophytes to the phosphorus nutrition of their epiphytes and the rates of P release by Myriophyllum spicatum L. were measured in situ on fully labeled (32P) plants. The epiphytes derived only 3.4–9.0% of their P from the supporting macrophyte, indicating that previously suggested macrophyte‐epiphyte nutrient interactions are of relatively minor importance. Although high diurnal P release rates (x̄ = 3.24 µg·g‒1·h‒1) were observed for the Myriophyllum‐epiphyte complex, Myriophyllum accounted for only 9.9% (0.32 µg·g−1·h−1) of the total P released: The Myriophyllum‐derived P was, however, released in a highly available soluble form (minimum estimate: 60.3%). During the growing season, Myriophyllum thus appears to be principally important as a physical support for an active microbial community rather than as a P source to its epiphyton and surrounding waters.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The contribution of nine species of macrophytes to the phosphorus nutrition of their epiphytes and the rates of P release by Myriophyllum spicatum L. were measured in situ on fully labeled (32P) plants. The epiphytes derived only 3.4–9.0% of their P from the supporting macrophyte, indicating that previously suggested macrophyte‐epiphyte nutrient interactions are of relatively minor importance. Although high diurnal P release rates (x̄ = 3.24 µg·g‒1·h‒1) were observed for the Myriophyllum‐epiphyte complex, Myriophyllum accounted for only 9.9% (0.32 µg·g−1·h−1) of the total P released: The Myriophyllum‐derived P was, however, released in a highly available soluble form (minimum estimate: 60.3%). During the growing season, Myriophyllum thus appears to be principally important as a physical support for an active microbial community rather than as a P source to its epiphyton and surrounding waters.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 144 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The contribution of nine species of macrophytes to the phosphorus nutrition of their epiphytes and the rates of P release by Myriophyllum spicatum L. were measured in situ on fully labeled (32P) plants. The epiphytes derived only 3.4–9.0% of their P from the supporting macrophyte, indicating that previously suggested macrophyte‐epiphyte nutrient interactions are of relatively minor importance. Although high diurnal P release rates (x̄ = 3.24 µg·g‒1·h‒1) were observed for the Myriophyllum‐epiphyte complex, Myriophyllum accounted for only 9.9% (0.32 µg·g−1·h−1) of the total P released: The Myriophyllum‐derived P was, however, released in a highly available soluble form (minimum estimate: 60.3%). During the growing season, Myriophyllum thus appears to be principally important as a physical support for an active microbial community rather than as a P source to its epiphyton and surrounding waters.

Key concepts: Myriophyllum, Macrophyte, Epiphyte, Phosphorus, Nutrient, Biology, Botany, Ecology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Phosphorus release by submerged macrophytes: Significance to epiphyton and phytoplankton1,1 — Research Paper | ScholarLens