1977•EcologyRequires access

Carbon Cycling in a Mixed Deciduous Forest Floor

Nelson T. Edwards, W. F. Harris

Open publisher page 238 citations

Abstract

A study of carbon cycling within the floor of a mixed deciduous forest included estimates of litterfall, litter standing crop, root turnover, lateral root standing crop, and measurements of gaseous carbon losses from the various components. Annual carbon inputs to the system were 161 g C ° m—2 as litterfall and 733 g C ° m—2 as small roots (<0.5 cm diam). Mean annual standing pools were: 01 litter 126 g C ° m—2, 02 litter 111 g C ° m—2, small roots 340 g C ° m—2, large roots 395 g C ° m—2, and soil detritus 12,850 g C ° m—2. Annual total carbon efflux, measured in situ with an open airflow infrared gas analysis system was 1,065 g C ° m—2. Of this total, 35% was accounted for by respiration of live roots, 42.2% from root decay, 10.9% from 01 litter, and 9.7% from 02 litter. The remaining 2.2% is within the range likely associated with catabolism of root exudates and soil organic detritus. These component estimates were based on respiration rates of the individual components using a differential respirometer.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A study of carbon cycling within the floor of a mixed deciduous forest included estimates of litterfall, litter standing crop, root turnover, lateral root standing crop, and measurements of gaseous carbon losses from the various components. Annual carbon inputs to the system were 161 g C ° m—2 as litterfall and 733 g C ° m—2 as small roots (<0.5 cm diam). Mean annual standing pools were: 01 litter 126 g C ° m—2, 02 litter 111 g C ° m—2, small roots 340 g C ° m—2, large roots 395 g C ° m—2, and soil detritus 12,850 g C ° m—2. Annual total carbon efflux, measured in situ with an open airflow infrared gas analysis system was 1,065 g C ° m—2. Of this total, 35% was accounted for by respiration of live roots, 42.2% from root decay, 10.9% from 01 litter, and 9.7% from 02 litter. The remaining 2.2% is within the range likely associated with catabolism of root exudates and soil organic detritus. These component estimates were based on respiration rates of the individual components using a differential respirometer.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 238 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A study of carbon cycling within the floor of a mixed deciduous forest included estimates of litterfall, litter standing crop, root turnover, lateral root standing crop, and measurements of gaseous carbon losses from the various components. Annual carbon inputs to the system were 161 g C ° m—2 as litterfall and 733 g C ° m—2 as small roots (<0.5 cm diam). Mean annual standing pools were: 01 litter 126 g C ° m—2, 02 litter 111 g C ° m—2, small roots 340 g C ° m—2, large roots 395 g C ° m—2, and soil detritus 12,850 g C ° m—2. Annual total carbon efflux, measured in situ with an open airflow infrared gas analysis system was 1,065 g C ° m—2. Of this total, 35% was accounted for by respiration of live roots, 42.2% from root decay, 10.9% from 01 litter, and 9.7% from 02 litter. The remaining 2.2% is within the range likely associated with catabolism of root exudates and soil organic detritus. These component estimates were based on respiration rates of the individual components using a differential respirometer.

Key concepts: Plant litter, Litter, Detritus, Forest floor, Soil respiration, Standing crop, Cycling, Deciduous

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Carbon Cycling in a Mixed Deciduous Forest Floor — Research Paper | ScholarLens