2011Unpublished venueRequires access

Evaluation of the error induced by an incorrect positioning of the handset against the SAM phantom for SAR calculations

Vikass Monebhurrun, M.F. Wong, A. Gati, Joe Wiart

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Inter-laboratory comparisons of Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) calculations sometimes show discrepancies between the results. An incorrect positioning of the handset against the head phantom may be one of the possible causes of the observed discrepancies. In order to evaluate the error induced by an incorrect positioning of the device, two commercially available mobile phones with different antenna configurations - one with a built-in PIFA (Planar Inverted-F Antenna) and the other with an external helicoidal antenna- are herein selected for SAR calculations using the SAM (Specific Anthropomorphic Mannequin) head phantom. Using the initial handset/phantom position defined by international dosimetric standards as the reference configuration considered to be correct, several incorrect but nonetheless acceptable handset/phantom configurations are generated and the computed SAR values compared. Results show that deviations with respect to the reference positions may induce up to about 8% difference in the maximum 10°g averaged SAR values in the case of the mobile phone with the external helicoidal antenna.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Inter-laboratory comparisons of Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) calculations sometimes show discrepancies between the results. An incorrect positioning of the handset against the head phantom may be one of the possible causes of the observed discrepancies. In order to evaluate the error induced by an incorrect positioning of the device, two commercially available mobile phones with different antenna configurations - one with a built-in PIFA (Planar Inverted-F Antenna) and the other with an external helicoidal antenna- are herein selected for SAR calculations using the SAM (Specific Anthropomorphic Mannequin) head phantom. Using the initial handset/phantom position defined by international dosimetric standards as the reference configuration considered to be correct, several incorrect but nonetheless acceptable handset/phantom configurations are generated and the computed SAR values compared. Results show that deviations with respect to the reference positions may induce up to about 8% difference in the maximum 10°g averaged SAR values in the case of the mobile phone with the external helicoidal antenna.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Inter-laboratory comparisons of Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) calculations sometimes show discrepancies between the results. An incorrect positioning of the handset against the head phantom may be one of the possible causes of the observed discrepancies. In order to evaluate the error induced by an incorrect positioning of the device, two commercially available mobile phones with different antenna configurations - one with a built-in PIFA (Planar Inverted-F Antenna) and the other with an external helicoidal antenna- are herein selected for SAR calculations using the SAM (Specific Anthropomorphic Mannequin) head phantom. Using the initial handset/phantom position defined by international dosimetric standards as the reference configuration considered to be correct, several incorrect but nonetheless acceptable handset/phantom configurations are generated and the computed SAR values compared. Results show that deviations with respect to the reference positions may induce up to about 8% difference in the maximum 10°g averaged SAR values in the case of the mobile phone with the external helicoidal antenna.

Key concepts: Handset, Specific absorption rate, Imaging phantom, Antenna (radio), Head (geology), Computer science, Position (finance), Planar

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of the error induced by an incorrect positioning of the handset against the SAM phantom for SAR calculations — Research Paper | ScholarLens