2003Diabetes CareOpen access

Photography or Ophthalmoscopy for Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy?

Hendrik A. van Leiden, Annette C. Moll, Joost Dekker, Michael D. Abràmoff, B.C.P. Polak

Open full text 8 citations

Abstract

The U.K. National Screening Committee recommended digital fundus photography as the screening method of choice for diabetic retinopathy (DR). However, concerns have been expressed about replacing ophthalmoscopy with slit-lamp biomicroscopy by digital photography. These concerns included the possibility of missing peripheral and stereoscopic visible retinal lesions; increased chance of a technical failure compared with ophthalmoscopy, resulting in more reexaminations; and higher cost (1). New data from our study of 453 patients with diabetes, aged 31–86 years, highlight the need for a careful consideration of the retinal area photographed and the minimal resolution of images to detect DR.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The U.K. National Screening Committee recommended digital fundus photography as the screening method of choice for diabetic retinopathy (DR). However, concerns have been expressed about replacing ophthalmoscopy with slit-lamp biomicroscopy by digital photography. These concerns included the possibility of missing peripheral and stereoscopic visible retinal lesions; increased chance of a technical failure compared with ophthalmoscopy, resulting in more reexaminations; and higher cost (1). New data from our study of 453 patients with diabetes, aged 31–86 years, highlight the need for a careful consideration of the retinal area photographed and the minimal resolution of images to detect DR.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The U.K. National Screening Committee recommended digital fundus photography as the screening method of choice for diabetic retinopathy (DR). However, concerns have been expressed about replacing ophthalmoscopy with slit-lamp biomicroscopy by digital photography. These concerns included the possibility of missing peripheral and stereoscopic visible retinal lesions; increased chance of a technical failure compared with ophthalmoscopy, resulting in more reexaminations; and higher cost (1). New data from our study of 453 patients with diabetes, aged 31–86 years, highlight the need for a careful consideration of the retinal area photographed and the minimal resolution of images to detect DR.

Key concepts: Medicine, Ophthalmoscopy, Diabetic retinopathy, Optometry, Ophthalmology, Diabetes mellitus, Retinopathy, Photography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Photography or Ophthalmoscopy for Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy? — Research Paper | ScholarLens