1985Sydney studies in society and cultureRequires access

Feudalism: interpretative category or framework of life in the Medieval West?

John O. Ward

Open publisher page 20 citations

Abstract

As a term of some utility in describing political, social and economic institutions, 'feudalism' still has considerable currency beyond the field of the medieval European West.l Nevertheless, its use by historians of the medieval West suggests widespread disagreement over its essential implications, and betrays a tendency to concentrate discussion no longer on the term itself, or on a generalised notion of a 'feudal' society, but upon the various discrete institutions, social practices and customs that make up the medieval·· societies historians were once happy enough to call 'feudal'. The present review of scholarly usage in regard to 'medieval feudalism' contains two parts. In the first, I illustrate the various often overlapping and competing meanings that historians since the turn of the century have ascribed to the terms 'feudal' and 'feudalism', and in the second I offer some comments on this diversity of opinion.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

As a term of some utility in describing political, social and economic institutions, 'feudalism' still has considerable currency beyond the field of the medieval European West.l Nevertheless, its use by historians of the medieval West suggests widespread disagreement over its essential implications, and betrays a tendency to concentrate discussion no longer on the term itself, or on a generalised notion of a 'feudal' society, but upon the various discrete institutions, social practices and customs that make up the medieval·· societies historians were once happy enough to call 'feudal'. The present review of scholarly usage in regard to 'medieval feudalism' contains two parts. In the first, I illustrate the various often overlapping and competing meanings that historians since the turn of the century have ascribed to the terms 'feudal' and 'feudalism', and in the second I offer some comments on this diversity of opinion.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

As a term of some utility in describing political, social and economic institutions, 'feudalism' still has considerable currency beyond the field of the medieval European West.l Nevertheless, its use by historians of the medieval West suggests widespread disagreement over its essential implications, and betrays a tendency to concentrate discussion no longer on the term itself, or on a generalised notion of a 'feudal' society, but upon the various discrete institutions, social practices and customs that make up the medieval·· societies historians were once happy enough to call 'feudal'. The present review of scholarly usage in regard to 'medieval feudalism' contains two parts. In the first, I illustrate the various often overlapping and competing meanings that historians since the turn of the century have ascribed to the terms 'feudal' and 'feudalism', and in the second I offer some comments on this diversity of opinion.

Key concepts: Feudalism, Politics, Diversity (politics), Currency, History, Social science, Classics, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Feudalism: interpretative category or framework of life in the Medieval West? — Research Paper | ScholarLens