1975Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciencesRequires access

The morphology, classification and evolution of the Trinucleidae (Trilobita)

C. P. Hughes, J. K. Ingham, R.F. Addison

Open publisher page 68 citations

Abstract

Abstract The morphology of the trinucleid exoskeleton is reassessed and various new structures and terms defined. On the basis of new interpretations of cephalic morphology, particularly that of the fringe, of all known genera, a new subfamilial classification is proposed. Two new genera, Deanaspis and Whittardolithus, and the subfamily Reedolithinae are proposed, and the genus Botrioides Stetson resurrected. The existing subfamilies, Trinucleinae, Gryptolithinae and Marrolithinae are recast considerably and the Tretaspidinae, Novaspidinae and Incaiinae rejected. The Hanchungolithinae is left unmodified. Evolution within the family is discussed together with the distribution of genera in terms of recent palaeogeographic reconstructions. A review of the relations between phylogeny and ontogeny confirms the essentially recapitulative nature of trinucleid ontogenies. A list of current generic assignments of known species is given

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract The morphology of the trinucleid exoskeleton is reassessed and various new structures and terms defined. On the basis of new interpretations of cephalic morphology, particularly that of the fringe, of all known genera, a new subfamilial classification is proposed. Two new genera, Deanaspis and Whittardolithus, and the subfamily Reedolithinae are proposed, and the genus Botrioides Stetson resurrected. The existing subfamilies, Trinucleinae, Gryptolithinae and Marrolithinae are recast considerably and the Tretaspidinae, Novaspidinae and Incaiinae rejected. The Hanchungolithinae is left unmodified. Evolution within the family is discussed together with the distribution of genera in terms of recent palaeogeographic reconstructions. A review of the relations between phylogeny and ontogeny confirms the essentially recapitulative nature of trinucleid ontogenies. A list of current generic assignments of known species is given

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 68 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract The morphology of the trinucleid exoskeleton is reassessed and various new structures and terms defined. On the basis of new interpretations of cephalic morphology, particularly that of the fringe, of all known genera, a new subfamilial classification is proposed. Two new genera, Deanaspis and Whittardolithus, and the subfamily Reedolithinae are proposed, and the genus Botrioides Stetson resurrected. The existing subfamilies, Trinucleinae, Gryptolithinae and Marrolithinae are recast considerably and the Tretaspidinae, Novaspidinae and Incaiinae rejected. The Hanchungolithinae is left unmodified. Evolution within the family is discussed together with the distribution of genera in terms of recent palaeogeographic reconstructions. A review of the relations between phylogeny and ontogeny confirms the essentially recapitulative nature of trinucleid ontogenies. A list of current generic assignments of known species is given

Key concepts: Subfamily, Morphology (biology), Genus, Biology, Zoology, Evolutionary biology, Phylogenetics, Paleontology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The morphology, classification and evolution of the Trinucleidae (Trilobita) — Research Paper | ScholarLens