Revisiting the Role of “Shared Value” in the Business-Society Relationship
Mark A. Aakhus, Michael J. Bzdak
Abstract
Mark A. Aakhus, Michael J. Bzdak
Abstract
Abstract: This article critically examines Porter and Kramer’s shared value concept to identify its boundaries and limits as a framework for understanding the role of phi-lanthropy and CSR relative to the role of business in society. Cases of implementation and alternative perspectives on innovation reveal that, despite its appeal and uptake in corporate and philanthropic circles, shared value merely advances the conventional rhetoric that what is good for business is good for society. The shared value approach narrows what counts as social value and avoids the friction between business and society. The consequence is that the approach is problematic as a framework for ad-dressing sustainability and development, and an insufficient basis for decision-making about philanthropy and CSR. Key Words: corporate social responsibility, strategic philanthropy, collaborative governance, decision-making, business value
OpenAlex reports 129 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Abstract: This article critically examines Porter and Kramer’s shared value concept to identify its boundaries and limits as a framework for understanding the role of phi-lanthropy and CSR relative to the role of business in society. Cases of implementation and alternative perspectives on innovation reveal that, despite its appeal and uptake in corporate and philanthropic circles, shared value merely advances the conventional rhetoric that what is good for business is good for society. The shared value approach narrows what counts as social value and avoids the friction between business and society. The consequence is that the approach is problematic as a framework for ad-dressing sustainability and development, and an insufficient basis for decision-making about philanthropy and CSR. Key Words: corporate social responsibility, strategic philanthropy, collaborative governance, decision-making, business value
Key concepts: Creating shared value, Value (mathematics), Business, Value creation, Applied philosophy, Business ethics, Management, Business administration