2012•Business and Professional Ethics JournalRequires access

Revisiting the Role of “Shared Value” in the Business-Society Relationship

Mark A. Aakhus, Michael J. Bzdak

Open publisher page 129 citations

Abstract

Abstract: This article critically examines Porter and Kramer’s shared value concept to identify its boundaries and limits as a framework for understanding the role of phi-lanthropy and CSR relative to the role of business in society. Cases of implementation and alternative perspectives on innovation reveal that, despite its appeal and uptake in corporate and philanthropic circles, shared value merely advances the conventional rhetoric that what is good for business is good for society. The shared value approach narrows what counts as social value and avoids the friction between business and society. The consequence is that the approach is problematic as a framework for ad-dressing sustainability and development, and an insufficient basis for decision-making about philanthropy and CSR. Key Words: corporate social responsibility, strategic philanthropy, collaborative governance, decision-making, business value

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract: This article critically examines Porter and Kramer’s shared value concept to identify its boundaries and limits as a framework for understanding the role of phi-lanthropy and CSR relative to the role of business in society. Cases of implementation and alternative perspectives on innovation reveal that, despite its appeal and uptake in corporate and philanthropic circles, shared value merely advances the conventional rhetoric that what is good for business is good for society. The shared value approach narrows what counts as social value and avoids the friction between business and society. The consequence is that the approach is problematic as a framework for ad-dressing sustainability and development, and an insufficient basis for decision-making about philanthropy and CSR. Key Words: corporate social responsibility, strategic philanthropy, collaborative governance, decision-making, business value

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 129 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract: This article critically examines Porter and Kramer’s shared value concept to identify its boundaries and limits as a framework for understanding the role of phi-lanthropy and CSR relative to the role of business in society. Cases of implementation and alternative perspectives on innovation reveal that, despite its appeal and uptake in corporate and philanthropic circles, shared value merely advances the conventional rhetoric that what is good for business is good for society. The shared value approach narrows what counts as social value and avoids the friction between business and society. The consequence is that the approach is problematic as a framework for ad-dressing sustainability and development, and an insufficient basis for decision-making about philanthropy and CSR. Key Words: corporate social responsibility, strategic philanthropy, collaborative governance, decision-making, business value

Key concepts: Creating shared value, Value (mathematics), Business, Value creation, Applied philosophy, Business ethics, Management, Business administration

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Revisiting the Role of “Shared Value” in the Business-Society Relationship — Research Paper | ScholarLens