2013•Journal of Software & Systems DevelopmentOpen access

The Impact of the Combination between Task Designs and Think-Aloud Approaches on Website Evaluation

Roobaea Alroobaea, Ali Hamad Al-Badi, Pam J. Mayhew

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

The growth of the Internet and related technologies has enabled the development of a new breed of dynamic website and applications that are growing rapidly in use, which have had a significant impact on many businesses.Usability testing is a method widely used for measuring the usability of a system from the perspective of real users.The main aim of this paper is to explore the efficiency of three types of usability testing method by discovering usability problems through a combination of three proposed task designs and three types of 'think-aloud' approach, and to compare the results of these methods with those of the traditional usability testing method that has been published separately.This is a missing area in usability testing.The quantitative and qualitative data are collected and analysed in order to assess the efficiency of the three combinations in terms of the usability problems encountered and their severity, and the success rate and user satisfaction of the websites being tested, through the feedback received.The research findings show clearly that the task scenarios and how they are designed and combined with different types of 'think-aloud' approaches can influence the usability testing results by discovering different types of usability problems, and can affect the results of usability measures, such as success rate, errors number and time spent.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The growth of the Internet and related technologies has enabled the development of a new breed of dynamic website and applications that are growing rapidly in use, which have had a significant impact on many businesses.Usability testing is a method widely used for measuring the usability of a system from the perspective of real users.The main aim of this paper is to explore the efficiency of three types of usability testing method by discovering usability problems through a combination of three proposed task designs and three types of 'think-aloud' approach, and to compare the results of these methods with those of the traditional usability testing method that has been published separately.This is a missing area in usability testing.The quantitative and qualitative data are collected and analysed in order to assess the efficiency of the three combinations in terms of the usability problems encountered and their severity, and the success rate and user satisfaction of the websites being tested, through the feedback received.The research findings show clearly that the task scenarios and how they are designed and combined with different types of 'think-aloud' approaches can influence the usability testing results by discovering different types of usability problems, and can affect the results of usability measures, such as success rate, errors number and time spent.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The growth of the Internet and related technologies has enabled the development of a new breed of dynamic website and applications that are growing rapidly in use, which have had a significant impact on many businesses.Usability testing is a method widely used for measuring the usability of a system from the perspective of real users.The main aim of this paper is to explore the efficiency of three types of usability testing method by discovering usability problems through a combination of three proposed task designs and three types of 'think-aloud' approach, and to compare the results of these methods with those of the traditional usability testing method that has been published separately.This is a missing area in usability testing.The quantitative and qualitative data are collected and analysed in order to assess the efficiency of the three combinations in terms of the usability problems encountered and their severity, and the success rate and user satisfaction of the websites being tested, through the feedback received.The research findings show clearly that the task scenarios and how they are designed and combined with different types of 'think-aloud' approaches can influence the usability testing results by discovering different types of usability problems, and can affect the results of usability measures, such as success rate, errors number and time spent.

Key concepts: Think aloud protocol, Task (project management), Computer science, Human–computer interaction, Information retrieval, Psychology, World Wide Web, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Impact of the Combination between Task Designs and Think-Aloud Approaches on Website Evaluation — Research Paper | ScholarLens